Paper · 2024 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Impact of Some Soil Amendments on Productivity and Insect Infestation of Cowpeaunder Water Stress in New Lands

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · public-domain

Abstract

An urgent food security problem is emerging in Egypt caused by rapidly increasing food demand exacerbated by intensifying fresh water scarcity.Hence, the study objective is to enhance cowpea production by using soil amendments under water stress in new agricultural soil.In this study, different water stress regimes were applied and soil amendments (biochar and compost, and biochar and compost) with application rate of 2 ton/ feddan were used.The rice straw biochar (RSB) was synthesis by using the slow pyrolysis process and the compost (COM) was composted from agriculture waste.The characterizations of RSB and COM have been investigated.In addition, the experiment has been designed through two successive seasons 2021 and 2022 at the Shandweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag, Egypt, for cultivating cowpea under a drip irrigation system with three replicates.During the experiments, insect infestation (Aphis craccivora, Liriomyza trifolii and Empoasca decipiens), some plant traits and soil properties were examined.The findings showed that cowpea production was significantly reduced as a result of water stress.In addition, using COM, RSB and COM+RSB can be alleviating the water stress impact on some plant and soil properties.Thence, the result leads to a preliminary recommendation for the use the mixture between biochar and compost to reduce the negative effect of water stress on cowpea and soil properties in new reclaimed soil.Thence, these amendments can be applied as a tool to suppress the populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiens in future cowpea IPM operations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced cowpea production.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
cowpea productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea production was significantly reduced as a result of water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COM alleviated the impact of water stress on some plant and soil properties.

Treatment
COMe0
Outcome
water stress impact on some plant and soil propertiese0
Direction
alleviatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using COM, RSB and COM+RSB can be alleviating the water stress impact on some plant and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpeaunder Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RSB alleviated the impact of water stress on some plant and soil properties.

Treatment
RSBe0
Outcome
water stress impact on some plant and soil propertiese0
Direction
alleviatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using COM, RSB and COM+RSB can be alleviating the water stress impact on some plant and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpeaunder Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COM+RSB alleviated the impact of water stress on some plant and soil properties.

Treatment
COM+RSBe0
Outcome
water stress impact on some plant and soil propertiese0
Direction
alleviatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using COM, RSB and COM+RSB can be alleviating the water stress impact on some plant and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpeaunder Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–97 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors preliminarily recommend a biochar and compost mixture to reduce water stress effects on cowpea and soil properties in new reclaimed soil.

Outcome
use the mixture between biochar and compost to reduce the negative effect of water stress on cowpea and soil propertiese0
Setting
new reclaimed soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preliminary recommendation for the use the mixture between biochar and compost to reduce the negative effect of water stress on cowpea and soil properties in new reclaimed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1451 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these amendments for future suppression of A. craccivora in cowpea IPM.

Interactor
A. craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these amendments can be applied as a tool to suppress the populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiens in future cowpea IPM operations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1609 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these amendments for future suppression of L. trifolii in cowpea IPM.

Interactor
L. trifoliiLiriomyza trifoliie0pest
Outcome
populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liriomyza trifolii
Liriomyza trifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLonsdale O, Murphy ST, Scheffer SJ · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these amendments can be applied as a tool to suppress the populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiens in future cowpea IPM operations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1609 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these amendments for future suppression of E. decipiens in cowpea IPM.

Interactor
E. decipiensHebata decipiense0pest
Outcome
populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these amendments can be applied as a tool to suppress the populations of A. craccivora, L. trifolii, and E. decipiens in future cowpea IPM operations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1609 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.