Paper · 1996 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

INFLUENCE OF WATER SALINITY IRRIGATION ON SPIDER MITE INFESTATION AND COTTON LEAVES CONTENTS

HASSAN A. TAHA; SADEK A. A. EL-RAIES

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two cotton varieties (Giza 45 and 81) were cultivated in 10kg soil/pot in 1992 and 1993 seasons. Three diluted sea water levels (0 , 10000 and 20000 ppm) were used through the growth stages of the plant : seedling, vegetative, budding, flowering, boiling and maturity. The results showed that under normal water irrigation, two peaks of mite population occurred on cotton plants during the seedling and flowering stages. Giza 45 variety was more susceptible to mite infesta‌tion than Giza 81. Influence of water salinity irrigation on spider mite Tetranychus arabicus Attiah and cotton leaves content were studied. The results revealed that spider mite infestation decreased sharply with the high level of water salinity irrigation. Also the relation between sodi‌um, potassium and nitrogen contents in cotton leaves on the abundance of T.arabicus was investigated as a result of water salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under normal irrigation cotton mite populations had two peaks, at seedling and flowering stages.

Organ / stage
seedling and flowering stagese0
Treatment
normal water irrigatione0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite populatione0
Value
two peakse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under normal water irrigation, two peaks of mite population occurred on cotton plants during the seedling and flowering stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 45 cotton was more susceptible to mite infestation than Giza 81.

Material
Giza 45e0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite infesta‌tione0
Direction
more susceptiblee0
Comparator
Giza 81e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 45 variety was more susceptible to mite infesta‌tion than Giza 81.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two cotton varieties (Giza 45 and 81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation salinity sharply decreased spider mite infestation on cotton.

Treatment
high level of water salinity irrigatione0
Interactor
Tetranychus arabicus Attiahe1pest
Outcome
spider mite infestatione0
Direction
decreased sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spider mite infestation decreased sharply with the high level of water salinity irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“spider mite Tetranychus arabicus Attiah and cotton leaves content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–600 · show in text ↑

salinity · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.