Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Micronutrient-enriched organic amendments for maize cultivation in sod-ic soils: A multivariate analysis perspective

D Madhupriyaa; M Baskar; T Uma Maheswari; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Trichy, under the All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP), to assess the effect of organic amendments and micronutrient enrichment on maize (Zea mays L.) performance in sodic soil. The study utilized vermicompost (VC) and farmyard manure (FYM) combined with an inorganic micronutrient mixture, applying eleven treatments in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Plant growth (height, leaf area, stem girth) and yield attributes (cob length, cob girth, kernel count, grain weight) were recorded and analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify key influencing traits. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in maize growth and yield by applying a micronutrient mixture at 25 kg ha-1 enriched with VC (1:10) and zinc-solubilizing bacteria (ZSB). This treatment recorded the highest cob length (21 cm), girth (5.41 cm), kernels per cob (573.8 kernels/Cob) and grain weight (3.96 kg), highlighting the synergistic effect of organic amendments, micronutrient enrichment and microbial inoculation. PCA revealed that the first principal component (PC1) captured 96.88 % of the variance, primarily influenced by cob girth, grain weight, stem girth, leaf area and plant height. Biplot analysis effectively distinguished treatment effects, highlighting the efficacy of fortified vermicompost with ZSB. This study emphasizes the potential of integrating organic and inorganic inputs with PCA as a powerful tool for identifying key yield determinants in sodic soils, contributing to sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost enriched with micronutrients and zinc-solubilizing bacteria significantly improved maize growth and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
micronutrient mixture at 25 kg ha-1 enriched with VC (1:10) and zinc-solubilizing bacteria (ZSB)e0
Interactor
zinc-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
maize growth and yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated a significant improvement in maize growth and yield by applying a micronutrient mixture at 25 kg ha-1 enriched with VC (1:10) and zinc-solubilizing bacteria (ZSB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced maximum cob length of 21 cm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
cob lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment recorded the highest cob length (21 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced maximum cob girth of 5.41 cm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
girthe0
Value
5.41 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girth (5.41 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced 573.8 kernels per cob.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
kernels per cobe0
Value
573.8 kernels/Cobe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kernels per cob (573.8 kernels/Cob)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced grain weight of 3.96 kg.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Value
3.96 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight (3.96 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC1 accounted for 96.88 % of variance, driven primarily by five growth and yield traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
variancee0
Value
96.88 %e0
Qualifier
cob girth, grain weight, stem girth, leaf area and plant heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PCA revealed that the first principal component (PC1) captured 96.88 % of the variance, primarily influenced by cob girth, grain weight, stem girth, leaf area and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biplot analysis distinguished treatment effects.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
distinguished treatment effectse0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biplot analysis effectively distinguished treatment effects, highlighting the efficacy of fortified vermicompost with ZSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

80 papers: 73 positive, 7 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.