Paper · 2025 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Phytotoxicity of pulp industry sludge in Festuca arundinacea and Triticum aestivum in different soils

Richard A. Rodríguez Padrón; Leandro S. da Silva; Rodrigo Zarza; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of alternative waste products as organic soil amendments has become increasingly important for researchers and the industrial sector, as they promote environmental protection and sustainable development. The objective of this study was to assess phytotoxicity of different pulp industry sludge rates applied to two soils as soil amendment, based on their effects on seed germination and radicle elongation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and common wheat (Triticum aestivum). The pulp industry sludge rates applied were 1.31, 1.57, 2.61, 3.27, 3.92, and 5.23 Mg ha-1, based on soil liming requirements. Absorbent paper and soil without sludge application were used as control treatments. The bioassay was conducted by sowing 20 seeds in 15 g of soil, which were maintained in a germination chamber at 25 °C for 7 days (T. aestivum) and 14 days (F. arundinacea) with a 12-hour photoperiod. Relative germination percentage, relative root growth, germination index, normalized residual germination, and normalized residual root elongation were evaluated. The results highlight the potential of using pulp industry sludge as an organic soil amendment, as it showed significant improvements in germination and root elongation for F. arundinacea. Although phytotoxicity was observed in T. aestivum seeds at lower sludge rates, the toxic effect decreased at higher rates, indicating that the use of pulp industry sludge is promising for agricultural and environmental applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge significantly improved fescue germination and root elongation.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
germination and root elongatione0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed significant improvements in germination and root elongation for F. arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sludge rates were phytotoxic to wheat seeds.

Taxon
T. aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
lower sludge ratese0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytotoxicity was observed in T. aestivum seeds at lower sludge rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytotoxicity in wheat decreased at higher sludge rates.

Treatment
higher ratese0
Outcome
toxic effecte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the toxic effect decreased at higher rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1385 · show in text ↑

organic · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.