Abstract
The main hypothesis of this study is that a conservationist system combined with soil regenerative practices can reduce the incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina in soybean crops and consequently increase productivity. The study wasconducted in the experimental area of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen Campus, RS, Brazil, during the 2023/2024 harvest. The experimental design consisted of main blocks in which three production systems were allocated: 1) notillage black oats system with physical intervention; 2) no-tillage black oats system; and 3) no-tillage polyculture system. The results showed that the no-tillage polyculture system presented 36.5% and 31.7% lower incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina and consequently higher grain productivity with an increase of 23% (675 kg ha-1) and 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) in relation to the notillage black oats system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oats system. The weight of a thousand grains was thevariable which best explained the increase in productivity, with a significant increase of 7.9% and 7.01% in the no-tillage polyculture system compared to the no-tillage black oat system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oat system. The notillage system combined with regenerative practices is the best way to minimize losses due to root diseases in soybean crops.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage polyculture had 36.5% lower Macrophomina incidence than black oats with physical intervention.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of Macrophomina phaseolinae0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 36.5%e0
- Comparator
- notillage black oats system with physical interventione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the no-tillage polyculture system presented 36.5% and 31.7% lower incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina and consequently higher grain productivity with an increase of 23% (675 kg ha-1) and 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) in relation to the notillage black oats system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oats system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage polyculture had 31.7% lower Macrophomina incidence than the black oats system.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of Macrophomina phaseolinae0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 31.7%e0
- Comparator
- no-tillage black oats systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the no-tillage polyculture system presented 36.5% and 31.7% lower incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina and consequently higher grain productivity with an increase of 23% (675 kg ha-1) and 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) in relation to the notillage black oats system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oats system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage polyculture increased grain productivity by 23% (675 kg ha-1) against black oats with physical intervention.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 23% (675 kg ha-1)e0
- Comparator
- notillage black oats system with physical interventione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the no-tillage polyculture system presented 36.5% and 31.7% lower incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina and consequently higher grain productivity with an increase of 23% (675 kg ha-1) and 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) in relation to the notillage black oats system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oats system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage polyculture increased grain productivity by 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) against black oats.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 15.08% (473 kg ha-1)e0
- Comparator
- no-tillage black oats systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the no-tillage polyculture system presented 36.5% and 31.7% lower incidence of Macrophomina phaseolina and consequently higher grain productivity with an increase of 23% (675 kg ha-1) and 15.08% (473 kg ha-1) in relation to the notillage black oats system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oats system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-grain weight significantly increased 7.9% with polyculture versus black oats with physical intervention.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Outcome
- weight of a thousand grainse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.9%e0
- Comparator
- no-tillage black oat system with physical interventione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The weight of a thousand grains was thevariable which best explained the increase in productivity, with a significant increase of 7.9% and 7.01% in the no-tillage polyculture system compared to the no-tillage black oat system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oat system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-grain weight significantly increased 7.01% with polyculture versus black oats.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage polyculture systeme0
- Outcome
- weight of a thousand grainse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.01%e0
- Comparator
- no-tillage black oat systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The weight of a thousand grains was thevariable which best explained the increase in productivity, with a significant increase of 7.9% and 7.01% in the no-tillage polyculture system compared to the no-tillage black oat system with physical intervention and no-tillage black oat system.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-grain weight best explained the productivity increase.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Organ / stage
- grainse0
- Outcome
- increase in productivitye0
- Qualifier
- weight of a thousand grainse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The weight of a thousand grains was thevariable which best explained the increase in productivity”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend no-tillage combined with regenerative practices to minimize soybean root disease losses.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Outcome
- notillage system combined with regenerative practicese0
- Qualifier
- minimize losses due to root diseasese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The notillage system combined with regenerative practices is the best way to minimize losses due to root diseases in soybean crops.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · Macrophomina phaseolina · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
214 papers more in this group
See all 218 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.