Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of soil acidity and gypsum on maize drought resilience and root hydraulic conductance in response to soil fertilization with triple super phosphate

Thomas Sinclair; Nahid Jafarikouhini; Ashlynn Amick; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In previous experiments, soil fertilization with triple super phosphate (TSP) as compared to diammonium phosphate (DAP) was found to induce plant drought resilience. The previous experiments were done, however, on pH 6.6 soil and it was unknown whether TSP-induced drought resilience would exist at lower soil pH. Since the permeability of aquaporins has been shown to decrease with decreased pH, hypothetically lower soil pH would enhance the TSP-induced drought resilience. To test the hypothesis of root hydraulic conductance sensitivity to soil pH, treatments of soil acidification and gypsum application with TSP soil fertilization were undertaken. Plant drought resilience was determined on drying soil by measuring the soil water content at which the decrease in transpiration rate was initiated. It was found that watering the soil with an acetic acid solution of pH 5.4 resulted in a loss of plant drought resilience. In a separate experiment root hydraulic conductance was determined by over-pressurizing the rhizosphere and measuring plant sap exudation. Root hydraulic conductance of five maize genotypes all showed low root hydraulic conductance with TSP for 6.6 pH soil treatment as compared to 5.4 pH. On the other hand, gypsum application to TSP-treated soils resulted in decreased root hydraulic conductance. The application of gypsum to DAP-treated soil resulted in increased root hydraulic conductance, but this did not change plant drought resilience.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid watering at pH 5.4 caused loss of plant drought resilience.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
watering the soil with an acetic acid solution of pH 5.4e0
Outcome
plant drought resiliencee0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“watering the soil with an acetic acid solution of pH 5.4 resulted in a loss of plant drought resilience.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With TSP, five maize genotypes showed lower root hydraulic conductance at soil pH 6.6 than at pH 5.4.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
TSP for 6.6 pH soil treatmente0
Outcome
Root hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
5.4 pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root hydraulic conductance of five maize genotypes all showed low root hydraulic conductance with TSP for 6.6 pH soil treatment as compared to 5.4 pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum reduced root hydraulic conductance in TSP-treated soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
gypsum application to TSP-treated soilse0
Outcome
root hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gypsum application to TSP-treated soils resulted in decreased root hydraulic conductance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased root hydraulic conductance in DAP-treated soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of gypsum to DAP-treated soile0
Outcome
root hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of gypsum to DAP-treated soil resulted in increased root hydraulic conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum in DAP-treated soil did not change plant drought resilience.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
application of gypsum to DAP-treated soile0
Outcome
plant drought resiliencee0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of gypsum to DAP-treated soil resulted in increased root hydraulic conductance, but this did not change plant drought resilience.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑

irrigation · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.