Paper · 2025 · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi

Influences of Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs) and Culture Media on Micropropagation of Native Hemp (Cannabis sativa) Population from Türkiye

Cennet Yaman; Güngör Yılmaz; Serkan Uranbey

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have historically been the standard for supplemental lighting in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) cultivation in a greenhouse, but there is a lack of scientific understanding in C. sativa regarding different media under various LEDs in vitro conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the top-performing LEDs and nutrient media for micropropagation of C. sativa. In this study, two different spectra (white and red LEDs) and different media [MS, B5, MS+B5, ½ MS, ½ B5, ½ MS + ½ B5, and control (without medium)] were used, maintaining constant light photoperiod. The diversity of light spectra and nutrient media showed statistically significant differences for the growth parameters of C. sativa. Red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot length of 7.37 cm, whereas white LED exhibited the highest root length with 6.57 cm. Also, nutrient media were found to be effective on shoot growth in full-strength media, while on root growth in half-strength media. Among the plant growth parameters, the number of shoots and nodes per plant is of great importance for clonal propagation. B5 medium under red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot number with 4.64, whereas MS medium under white LED exhibited the highest node number with 5.87. Each LED source required the respective medium adjustment for the best results of the desired parameters. In this respect, the study may be advantageous for the selection of the appropriate nutrient medium and led spectrum in micropropagation of C. sativa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light spectra and media significantly affected growth parameters.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
light spectra and nutrient mediae0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The diversity of light spectra and nutrient media showed statistically significant differences for the growth parameters of C. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED produced shoot length of 7.37 cm.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Red LEDe0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
extraordinarily highe0
Value
7.37 cme0
Comparator
white LEDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot length of 7.37 cm, whereas white LED exhibited the highest root length with 6.57 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White LED gave highest root length of 6.57 cm.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
white LEDe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.57 cme0
Comparator
Red LEDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot length of 7.37 cm, whereas white LED exhibited the highest root length with 6.57 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-strength media promoted shoot growth.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
full-strength mediae0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient media were found to be effective on shoot growth in full-strength media, while on root growth in half-strength media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-strength media promoted root growth.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
half-strength mediae0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient media were found to be effective on shoot growth in full-strength media, while on root growth in half-strength media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B5 medium under red LED gave 4.64 shoots.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
B5 medium under red LEDe0
Outcome
shoot numbere0
Direction
extraordinarily highe0
Value
4.64e0
Comparator
MS medium under white LEDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B5 medium under red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot number with 4.64, whereas MS medium under white LED exhibited the highest node number with 5.87.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium under white LED gave highest node number, 5.87.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
MS medium under white LEDe0
Outcome
node numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.87e0
Comparator
B5 medium under red LEDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B5 medium under red LED provided an extraordinarily high shoot number with 4.64, whereas MS medium under white LED exhibited the highest node number with 5.87.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.