Paper · 2025 · Industrial Crops and Products

Optimization of micropropagation protocols and assessment of epigenetic changes in tissue cultures of diverse medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes

Damijana Kastelec; Simon Troha; Sinja Svetik; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Micropropagation is a crucial technique for the large-scale production of genetically uniform and pathogen-free Cannabis sativa . However, genotype-dependent responses and low multiplication rates often limit its efficiency. This study investigated the effects of basal media (Driver and Kuniyuki Walnut (DKW) and Murashige and Skoog (MS), plant growth regulators (thidiazuron (TDZ), indole butyric acid IBA, and gibberellic acid (GA₃)), and the mitogenic factor phytosulfokine-alpha (PSK-α) on the propagation and rooting efficiency of five medical cannabis genotypes. Simultaneous ex vitro rooting and acclimatization were also investigated as a streamlined approach for adapting in vitro plantlets grown under greenhouse conditions. Shoot multiplication was significantly influenced by the interaction between genotype and culture medium. While the number of shoots did not differ significantly between DKW and MS media, DKW promoted a greater shoot length, more nodes per culture, and a higher biomass. TDZ addition increased the shoot multiplication rate but reduced shoot length and increased callus formation. A decline in shoot length and number of nodes was observed across subcultures, particularly on DKW-based media and less on MS-based media. GA₃ effectively promoted shoot elongation and facilitated subsequent rooting and acclimatization. Suboptimal in vitro rooting led to the development of a novel ex vitro rooting protocol that combined rooting and acclimatization and achieved high success rates within 3 weeks, significantly reducing the overall micropropagation time. PSK-α had no significant effect on shoot multiplication or elongation. Furthermore, epigenetic analysis indicated progressive DNA hypomethylation in micropropagated shoots compared to greenhouse-grown plants, which increased with prolonged in vitro culture, possibly affecting gene expression and development. These results provide valuable insights into the processes of cannabis micropropagation and emphasize the need for further research on in vitro -induced epigenetic changes, including high-performance liquid chromatography based global DNA methylation analysis, bisulfite sequencing of differentially methylated genes and their regulatory regions, and the functional consequences of methylation changes on gene expression and plant morphological and physiological traits. • Micropropagation efficiency in cannabis varies by genotype and culture medium. • TDZ enhances shoot proliferation but reduces shoot length and increases basal callus formation. • Ex vitro rooting significantly improves cannabis rooting and acclimatization success. • In vitro culture indicates progressive DNA hypomethylation in cannabis shoots. • MSAP-Seq is a reliable method for analyzing DNA methylation in cannabis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot multiplication was significantly influenced by the interaction between genotype and culture medium

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Material
genotypee1
Treatment
culture mediume1
Outcome
Shoot multiplicatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot multiplication was significantly influenced by the interaction between genotype and culture medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW and MS media did not differ significantly in shoot number

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
DKWe1
Outcome
number of shootse1
Direction
did not differ significantlye1
Comparator
MS mediae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“While the number of shoots did not differ significantly between DKW and MS media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW promoted shoot length, nodes per culture and biomass compared with MS media

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
DKWe1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
promotede1
Qualifier
more nodes per culture, and a higher biomasse1
Comparator
MS mediae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“While the number of shoots did not differ significantly between DKW and MS media, DKW promoted a greater shoot length, more nodes per culture, and a higher biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ addition increased the shoot multiplication rate

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
TDZ additione1
Outcome
shoot multiplication ratee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“TDZ addition increased the shoot multiplication rate but reduced shoot length and increased callus formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ addition reduced shoot length

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
TDZ additione1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“TDZ addition increased the shoot multiplication rate but reduced shoot length and increased callus formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ addition increased callus formation

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
TDZ additione1
Outcome
callus formatione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“TDZ addition increased the shoot multiplication rate but reduced shoot length and increased callus formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length and number of nodes declined across subcultures, more on DKW-based media than on MS-based media

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
subculturese1
Outcome
shoot length and number of nodese1
Direction
declinee1
Qualifier
particularly on DKW-based media and less on MS-based mediae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“A decline in shoot length and number of nodes was observed across subcultures, particularly on DKW-based media and less on MS-based media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA₃ promoted shoot elongation

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
GA₃e1
Outcome
shoot elongatione1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA₃ effectively promoted shoot elongation and facilitated subsequent rooting and acclimatization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA₃ facilitated rooting and acclimatization

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
GA₃e1
Outcome
rooting and acclimatizatione1
Direction
facilitatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA₃ effectively promoted shoot elongation and facilitated subsequent rooting and acclimatization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ex vitro rooting protocol achieved high rooting and acclimatization success within 3 weeks

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
ex vitro rooting protocole1
Outcome
success ratese1
Direction
achievede1
Qualifier
within 3 weekse1
Setting
ex vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Suboptimal in vitro rooting led to the development of a novel ex vitro rooting protocol that combined rooting and acclimatization and achieved high success rates within 3 weeks, significantly reducing the overall micropropagation time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ex vitro rooting protocol significantly reduced the overall micropropagation time

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
ex vitro rooting protocole1
Outcome
overall micropropagation timee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Suboptimal in vitro rooting led to the development of a novel ex vitro rooting protocol that combined rooting and acclimatization and achieved high success rates within 3 weeks, significantly reducing the overall micropropagation time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSK-α had no significant effect on shoot multiplication or elongation

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
PSK-αe1
Outcome
shoot multiplication or elongatione1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“PSK-α had no significant effect on shoot multiplication or elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA hypomethylation in micropropagated shoots increased with prolonged in vitro culture, relative to greenhouse-grown plants

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
prolonged in vitro culturee1
Outcome
DNA hypomethylatione1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
progressivee1
Comparator
greenhouse-grown plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogen-free Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“epigenetic analysis indicated progressive DNA hypomethylation in micropropagated shoots compared to greenhouse-grown plants, which increased with prolonged in vitro culture, possibly affecting gene expression and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1898 · show in text ↑

Thidiazuron · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Thidiazuron · pest · Cannabis sativaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.