Paper · 2021 · Botany

DKW basal salts improve micropropagation and callogenesis compared with MS basal salts in multiple commercial cultivars of Cannabis sativa

Serena R.G. Page; Adrian S. Monthony; A. Maxwell P. Jones

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Existing Cannabis sativa micropropagation protocols use a limited number of cultivars and the results are often not reproducible. Currently, Murashige and Skoog basal salt mixture (MS) + 0.5 μmol/L thidiazuron (TDZ) has been reported as the optimal medium for nodal micropropagation, yet our preliminary studies with this medium have resulted in abnormal morphology and high mortality rates in multiple cultivars. Following an initial screen of basal salt mixtures [MS, B5, BABI, and Driver–Kuniyaki–Walnut (DKW)], we determined that DKW produced the healthiest plants. In a second experiment, the multiplication rate and canopy area of explants grown on MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ and DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ were compared using five drug-type cultivars. The combined multiplication average of explants grown on DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ was 1.5× higher than explants grown on MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ. Similarly, the combined average of the canopy area was twice as large on DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ. In the third experiment, callogenesis was compared using a concentration range of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (0–30 μmol/L) on both MS and DKW, and similarly, callus growth was superior on DKW. This study presents the largest comparison of basal salt compositions on the micropropagation of five commercially grown Cannabis cultivars to date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS plus TDZ caused abnormal morphology and high mortality in multiple cultivars.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
this mediume0
Outcome
abnormal morphology and high mortality ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our preliminary studies with this medium have resulted in abnormal morphology and high mortality rates in multiple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW produced the healthiest plants in the initial basal salt screen.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
DKWe0
Outcome
healthiest plantse0
Direction
healthieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we determined that DKW produced the healthiest plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW plus TDZ gave 1.5 times the multiplication average of MS plus TDZ.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZe0
Outcome
multiplication averagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.5×e0
Comparator
MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined multiplication average of explants grown on DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ was 1.5× higher than explants grown on MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW plus TDZ doubled average canopy area relative to MS plus TDZ.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZe0
Outcome
canopy areae0
Direction
twice as largee0
Comparator
MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined average of the canopy area was twice as large on DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combined multiplication average of explants grown on DKW + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ was 1.5× higher than explants grown on MS + 0.5 μmol/L TDZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus growth was superior on DKW.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
DKWe0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
MSt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“callus growth was superior on DKW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–138 · show in text ↑
t1

“MS basal salts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑

Thidiazuron · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Thidiazuron · pest · Cannabis sativaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.