Paper · 2025 · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of some seed treatments during storage on viability of some bread wheat varieties

M. A. Ali; E. A. Abd El-Lattief; E. A. Ali; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seed treatments (Neem oil 10 ml/kg, Mustard oil 10 ml/kg, Phosphine tablets 0.0125 g/kg) on three varieties of bread wheat grains (Giza 171, Giza 168 and Gimmaza 11) at four storage periods (Fresh grains, 3, 6, and 9 months). The experimental design was a completely randomized design with three replicates. The experiment was performed during the period from Jun 2022 until March 2023. The results demonstrated that all studied traits were significantly impacted by the assessed storage times. Consequently, the highest mean values of seed index, germination power (%), germination percentage (%), shoot and roots length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g) traits were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred. In addition, treating wheat grains with phosphine resulted in a significant increase in seed index, germination power (%) and germination percentage (%) traits compared to the control (without fumigation), while significant increases in roots length (cm), shoot length (cm) and seedling dry weight (g) were accompanied with treating wheat grains by neem oil compared to the control. Giza 171 Varity surpassed the others in all above traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All studied traits of bread wheat grains were significantly affected by storage time.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage timese0
Outcome
all studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“all studied traits were significantly impacted by the assessed storage times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed index, germination power and germination percentage were highest at the beginning of storage and then decreased gradually.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
seed index, germination power (%), germination percentage (%)e0
Direction
gradual decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed index, germination power (%), germination percentage (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root length and seedling dry weight were highest at the beginning of storage and then decreased gradually.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storagee1
Outcome
shoot and roots length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g)e0
Direction
gradual decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“shoot and roots length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–698 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treating wheat grains with phosphine significantly increased seed index, germination power and germination percentage compared with the unfumigated control.

Treatment
treating wheat grains with phosphinee0
Outcome
seed index, germination power (%) and germination percentage (%)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control (without fumigation)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat grains with phosphine resulted in a significant increase in seed index, germination power (%) and germination percentage (%) traits compared to the control (without fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treating wheat grains with neem oil was accompanied by significant increases in root length, shoot length and seedling dry weight compared with the control.

Treatment
treating wheat grains by neem oile0
Outcome
roots length (cm), shoot length (cm) and seedling dry weight (g)e0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in roots length (cm), shoot length (cm) and seedling dry weight (g) were accompanied with treating wheat grains by neem oil compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat variety Giza 171 surpassed the other varieties in all the above traits.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Giza 171e0
Outcome
all above traitse0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Giza 171 Varity surpassed the others in all above traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1219 · show in text ↑

storage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat seed stored in a refrigerator had the highest germination percentage

    Effect of storage containers and time on seed quality of wheat · 1970 · compared with polyethylene bag, tin container and earthen pitcher

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.