Paper · 2025 · FOOD SECURITY OF UKRAINE IN THE CONDITIONS OF POST-WAR RECOVERY: GLOBAL AND NATIONAL DIMENSIONS INTERNATIONAL FORUM Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference

INFLUENCE OF GROWING TECHNOLOGY ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CEREAL AND LEGUME CROPS

A.V. Panfilova; A.-M.O. Tarabrina

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the conditions of the Steppe of Ukraine, as a result of field studies in 2022-2024, the positive impact of resource and soil-saving technologies for cultivation of grain and legumes was proved. The yield of soybean when growing by no-till technology, on average during the years of research and by factor variety, amounted to 1.73 t/ha, which exceeded the indicators of the variant of classical technology by 0.29 t/ha or by 16.8%. The use of Mzuri-ProTil technology for winter wheat helped increase the grain yield-by 11.9%compared to classical crop technology

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till soybean yield was 1.73 t/ha, exceeding classical technology by 0.29 t/ha or 16.8%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no-till technologye0
Outcome
yield of soybeane0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
1.73 t/hae0
Qualifier
by 0.29 t/ha or by 16.8%e0
Comparator
classical technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of soybean when growing by no-till technology, on average during the years of research and by factor variety, amounted to 1.73 t/ha, which exceeded the indicators of the variant of classical technology by 0.29 t/ha or by 16.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“CEREAL AND LEGUME CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mzuri-ProTil increased winter wheat grain yield 11.9% over classical technology.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Mzuri-ProTil technologye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.9%e0
Comparator
classical crop technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of Mzuri-ProTil technology for winter wheat helped increase the grain yield-by 11.9%compared to classical crop technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–564 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.