Paper · 2025 · Foods

Study on Effect of Germination on Flavonoid Content and Nutritional Value of Different Varieties of Chickpeas

Jiyuan Xue; Jia Yang; Yongqi Yin

7
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

L.) were popular for their high nutritional profile and abundance of bioactive constituents, making them highly sought after in the consumer market. This investigation evaluated the impact of germination on the levels of total phenolics, total flavonoids, and other bioactive compounds, as well as free amino acids, soluble proteins, dietary fiber, and starch, in two chickpea sprout cultivars. The results demonstrated that germination significantly enhanced the concentrations of total flavonoids and phenolics in chickpeas. Compared to ungerminated seeds, the total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 and Xinying No. 2 sprouts increased by 3.95-fold and 3.25-fold, respectively, while total phenolic content increased by 2.47-fold and 2.38-fold. Germination also significantly augmented free amino acid, soluble protein, and total dietary fiber content while reducing resistant starch and insoluble dietary fiber. Concurrently, the bioaccessibility of essential nutrients was substantially improved, as indicated by enhanced solubility. This research provided valuable insights for optimizing the nutritional quality and bioactive compound content of chickpeas through sprouting technology. These results provided critical insights for optimizing the nutritional and functional properties of chickpeas via sprouting and established a scientific basis for the development of functional foods from germinated chickpeas, underscoring their potential to support dietary health and wellness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 sprouts by 3.95-fold versus ungerminated seeds.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Material
Xinying No. 1e0
Treatment
germinatione1
Outcome
total flavonoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.95-folde0
Comparator
ungerminated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 and Xinying No. 2 sprouts increased by 3.95-fold and 3.25-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination significantly enhanced the concentrations of total flavonoids and phenolics in chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–525 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ungerminated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 2 sprouts by 3.25-fold versus ungerminated seeds.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Material
Xinying No. 2e0
Treatment
germinatione1
Outcome
total flavonoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.25-folde0
Comparator
ungerminated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 and Xinying No. 2 sprouts increased by 3.95-fold and 3.25-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination significantly enhanced the concentrations of total flavonoids and phenolics in chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–525 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ungerminated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased total phenolic content in Xinying No. 1 sprouts by 2.47-fold versus ungerminated seeds.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Material
Xinying No. 1e3
Treatment
germinatione1
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
enhancede1
Value
2.47-folde0
Comparator
ungerminated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“total phenolic content increased by 2.47-fold and 2.38-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination significantly enhanced the concentrations of total flavonoids and phenolics in chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–525 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ungerminated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–557 · show in text ↑
e3

“total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 and Xinying No. 2 sprouts increased by 3.95-fold and 3.25-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased total phenolic content in Xinying No. 2 sprouts by 2.38-fold versus ungerminated seeds.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Material
Xinying No. 2e3
Treatment
germinatione1
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
enhancede1
Value
2.38-folde0
Comparator
ungerminated seedse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“total phenolic content increased by 2.47-fold and 2.38-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination significantly enhanced the concentrations of total flavonoids and phenolics in chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–525 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ungerminated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–557 · show in text ↑
e3

“total flavonoid content in Xinying No. 1 and Xinying No. 2 sprouts increased by 3.95-fold and 3.25-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased free amino acid, soluble protein, and total dietary fiber content.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Germinatione0
Outcome
free amino acid, soluble protein, and total dietary fiber contente0
Direction
augmentede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination also significantly augmented free amino acid, soluble protein, and total dietary fiber content while reducing resistant starch and insoluble dietary fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination reduced resistant starch and insoluble dietary fiber.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Germinatione0
Outcome
resistant starch and insoluble dietary fibere0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination also significantly augmented free amino acid, soluble protein, and total dietary fiber content while reducing resistant starch and insoluble dietary fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination improved essential nutrient bioaccessibility, indicated by solubility.

Taxon
ChickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
sprouting technologye1
Outcome
bioaccessibility of essential nutrientse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
enhanced solubilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Varieties of Chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“bioaccessibility of essential nutrients was substantially improved, as indicated by enhanced solubility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“through sprouting technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1192 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.