Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Sciences

Evaluation of Some Faba Bean Genotypes to Foliar Diseases under Biological, Organic and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization

Marwa Kh. A. Mohamed; Eman I. Abdel-Wahab; Nasr A. Ghazy; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-year experiment was conducted at the Sakha Agricultural Experiments and Research Station in the Agricultural Research Center (ARC) in the Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt, during the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 seasons. The study aimed to evaluate the resistance of some faba bean genotypes to leaf rust and chocolate spot by applying biological, organic, and mineral N fertilization to enhance seed yield, quality, and farmer’s profits. The treatments were the combinations between three fertilization sources (biological, organic, and mineral N fertilization) and eight faba bean genotypes (Giza 40, Giza 716, Sakha 1, Sakha 4, L2039/437/2015, L2141/353/2015, L2103/591/2014, and L2144/379/2015). The treatments were laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Fertilization sources were randomly assigned to the main plots, and the faba bean genotypes were allocated in sub-plots. Mineral N fertilization offered better protection against rust disease in Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 compared to biological or organic fertilization, while chocolate spot disease was lower after 90 days of sowing with biological fertilization. Rust disease incidence was lower in L2144/379/2015 treated with biological or organic fertilization at 70 and 90 days after sowing. L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 responded positively to biological fertilization, indicating their resistance to chocolate spots. Biological fertilization showed potential in enhancing foliar disease resistance in Sakha 4, Sakha 1, and Giza 716, leading to potentially higher yields. Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015, which were susceptible to foliar diseases, showed higher productivity with mineral N fertilization. Sakha 1, Sakha 4, L2039/437/2015, and L2144/379/2015 had higher seed protein and carbohydrate contents with organic fertilization, while L2103/591/2014 and L2141/353/2015 showed the same with biological fertilization. Giza 716 showed greater economic returns with biological fertilization. Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 demonstrated higher economic returns with mineral N fertilization. L2141/353/2015 had higher economic returns with organic fertilization, while L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 showed better returns with biological fertilization. Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Giza 716, and L2144/379/2015 treated with biological fertilization demonstrated higher productivity and profit with good quality compared to organic or mineral N fertilizations, suggesting that L2144/379/2015 is a promising genotype in foliar disease breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen better protected Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 against rust than biological or organic fertilization.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015e0
Treatment
Mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome
rust diseasee0
Direction
better protectione0
Comparator
biological or organic fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral N fertilization offered better protection against rust disease in Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 compared to biological or organic fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization lowered chocolate spot after 90 days.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
chocolate spot diseasee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
after 90 days of sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot disease was lower after 90 days of sowing with biological fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological or organic fertilization lowered rust incidence in L2144/379/2015 at 70 and 90 days.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2144/379/2015e0
Treatment
biological or organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
Rust disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
at 70 and 90 days after sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rust disease incidence was lower in L2144/379/2015 treated with biological or organic fertilization at 70 and 90 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 responded positively to biological fertilization for chocolate spot resistance.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015e0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
resistance to chocolate spotse0
Direction
responded positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 responded positively to biological fertilization, indicating their resistance to chocolate spots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization showed potential to enhance foliar disease resistance in Sakha 4, Sakha 1, and Giza 716.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 4, Sakha 1, and Giza 716e0
Treatment
Biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
foliar disease resistancee0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biological fertilization showed potential in enhancing foliar disease resistance in Sakha 4, Sakha 1, and Giza 716, leading to potentially higher yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen increased productivity of disease-susceptible Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015e0
Treatment
mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015, which were susceptible to foliar diseases, showed higher productivity with mineral N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization increased seed protein and carbohydrate in Sakha 1, Sakha 4, L2039/437/2015, and L2144/379/2015.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1, Sakha 4, L2039/437/2015, and L2144/379/2015e0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
seed protein and carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 1, Sakha 4, L2039/437/2015, and L2144/379/2015 had higher seed protein and carbohydrate contents with organic fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization gave L2103/591/2014 and L2141/353/2015 the same elevated seed protein and carbohydrate result.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2103/591/2014 and L2141/353/2015e0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
showed the samee0
Direction
samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L2103/591/2014 and L2141/353/2015 showed the same with biological fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization gave Giza 716 greater economic returns.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 716e0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 716 showed greater economic returns with biological fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen gave Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 higher economic returns.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015e0
Treatment
mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 40 and L2039/437/2015 demonstrated higher economic returns with mineral N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization gave L2141/353/2015 higher economic returns.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2141/353/2015e0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L2141/353/2015 had higher economic returns with organic fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2074–2143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization gave L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 better returns.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015e0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
returnse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L2103/591/2014 and L2144/379/2015 showed better returns with biological fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2151–2237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilization gave Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Giza 716, and L2144/379/2015 higher productivity and profit with good quality.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Giza 716, and L2144/379/2015e0
Treatment
biological fertilizatione0
Outcome
productivity and profit with good qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
organic or mineral N fertilizationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Giza 716, and L2144/379/2015 treated with biological fertilization demonstrated higher productivity and profit with good quality compared to organic or mineral N fertilizations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified L2144/379/2015 as promising for foliar disease breeding.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
L2144/379/2015e0
Outcome
promising genotype in foliar disease breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L2144/379/2015 is a promising genotype in foliar disease breeding programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2450–2525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · organism · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.