Paper · 2025 · Agrobiotechnologies and digital farming

Influence of biologization methods and soil cultivation systems on winter wheat crop formation

Razina Sabirova; Il'shat Vafin; Radik Safin

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study to assess the characteristics of winter wheat yield formation of Skipetr variety using various soil cultivation systems (moldboard, non-moldboard, zero) and types of fallow (bare fallow and various types of green manure fallow) on gray forest soil in the Kama agricultural production zone of the Republic of Tatarstan. The study was conducted in 2023-2024, based on a long-term production stationary experiment established in 2022. The autumn of 2023 was characterized by drought phenomena. During the spring-summer vegetation period of 2024, winter wheat experienced cold weather with a large amount of precipitation in May, then periodically experienced moisture deficit and elevated temperatures, which affected plant development. The total plot area for each variant was 0.5 ha, replicated three times (the total area of each experimental variant was 1.5 ha). The obtained data were processed using dispersion analysis. With the exception of the studied techniques, the agricultural technology of winter wheat cultivation was in accordance with those recommended for Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstan. The use of moldboard tillage led to a decrease in soil bulk density, while with no-till and zero tillage, there was a slight increase in this indicator, but within the optimal values for winter wheat. The content of productive moisture in the arable soil layer during the heading phase of winter wheat was maximum when using forage peas as a green manure crop and moldboard plowing. The use of zero tillage in combination with the use of white mustard and a vetch-oat mixture as green manure provided the maximum biological activity of the soil when using the linen fabric decomposition assessment method. The highest yield of winter wheat of Skipetr variety (4.89 t/ha) was obtained when using forage peas as a fallow crop against the background of no-till soil cultivation. In terms of gluten content, in all variants, the grain met the standards for class 1 food wheat according to GOST 9353-2016, but in most cases, according to other indicators, the grain met the requirements for class 3. Grain confirming requirements for the second class of food wheat was obtained using forage peas as a green manure against the background of no-moldboard cultivation, as well as against the background of vetch-oat fallow according to the no-till system. Taking into account the achievement of the maximum yield level (4.89 t/ha), the best quality characteristics and the greatest weight of 1000 grains (45.3 g) at the minimum cost of the obtained products, the most optimal biologization technique in the experimental conditions was the use of forage peas as a green manure against the background of a no-moldboard soil cultivation system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard tillage decreased soil bulk density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
moldboard tillagee0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of moldboard tillage led to a decrease in soil bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till slightly increased soil bulk density within optimal wheat values.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye1
Direction
slight increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no-till and zero tillage, there was a slight increase in this indicator, but within the optimal values for winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage slightly increased soil bulk density within optimal wheat values.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye1
Direction
slight increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no-till and zero tillage, there was a slight increase in this indicator, but within the optimal values for winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage peas plus moldboard plowing maximized productive soil moisture at wheat heading.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
heading phasee0
Treatment
forage peas as a green manure crop and moldboard plowinge0
Outcome
content of productive moisture in the arable soil layere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of productive moisture in the arable soil layer during the heading phase of winter wheat was maximum when using forage peas as a green manure crop and moldboard plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with white mustard maximized soil biological activity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
zero tillage in combination with the use of white mustarde0
Outcome
biological activity of the soile0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of zero tillage in combination with the use of white mustard and a vetch-oat mixture as green manure provided the maximum biological activity of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1701 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with vetch-oat mixture maximized soil biological activity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
biological activity of the soile0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
vetch-oat mixture as green manuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of zero tillage in combination with the use of white mustard and a vetch-oat mixture as green manure provided the maximum biological activity of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1701 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage pea fallow with no-till gave the highest Skipetr wheat yield, 4.89 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Skipetre0
Treatment
forage peas as a fallow crope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.89 t/hae0
Qualifier
no-till soil cultivatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of winter wheat of Skipetr variety (4.89 t/ha) was obtained when using forage peas as a fallow crop against the background of no-till soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain gluten met class 1 standard across all variants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
gluten contente0
Value
class 1e0
Qualifier
in all variantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of gluten content, in all variants, the grain met the standards for class 1 food wheat according to GOST 9353-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1933–2056 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other grain indicators generally met class 3 requirements.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
other indicatorse0
Value
class 3e0
Qualifier
in most casese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in most cases, according to other indicators, the grain met the requirements for class 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2062–2150 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage pea green manure with no-moldboard cultivation yielded class 2 grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
forage peas as a green manuree0
Outcome
Grain confirming requirements for the second class of food wheate0
Qualifier
no-moldboard cultivatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain confirming requirements for the second class of food wheat was obtained using forage peas as a green manure against the background of no-moldboard cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2316 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch-oat fallow with no-till yielded class 2 grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
vetch-oat fallowe0
Outcome
Grain confirming requirements for the second class of food wheate1
Qualifier
no-till systeme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against the background of vetch-oat fallow according to the no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2329–2403 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain confirming requirements for the second class of food wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2216 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended forage pea green manure with no-moldboard cultivation as optimal.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
use of forage peas as a green manure against the background of a no-moldboard soil cultivation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most optimal biologization technique in the experimental conditions was the use of forage peas as a green manure against the background of a no-moldboard soil cultivation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2608–2789 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.