Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The greatest decrease in humus content (2.48%) occurred in the two-field grain and fallow crop rotation.

A claim from Influence of Cultivation Technology on the Productivity of Spring Wheat and the Humus State of Southern Carbonate Soils of Northern Kazakhstan · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest decrease in humus content (2.48%) occurred in the two-field grain and fallow crop rotation.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two-field grain and fallow crop rotatione0
Outcome
humus contente0
Direction
greatest decreasee0
Value
2.48%e0
Comparator
virgin plote1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest decrease in humus content was observed in the two-field grain and fallow crop rotation (2.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1247
e1

“A virgin plot was used as a standard of soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–652
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71

Title

Influence of Cultivation Technology on the Productivity of Spring Wheat and the Humus State of Southern Carbonate Soils of Northern Kazakhstan

K. Kunanbayev; G. Churkina; V. Filonov; et al. Journal of Ecological Engineering 2022. doi:10.12911/22998993/145459

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f1a9ca91e824b743c721eec52040c7b2fc18b05159cca2838b0930923fb245dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.