Paper · 2025 · Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries

Determinants of the Uses and Conservation of Terminalia superba in Forest Guinea

Papa Bilivogui; Hermann Zinsou; Achille Hounkpevi; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

For centuries, human communities have relied on natural resources to satisfy their various needs (food, health, housing, etc.). Among these resources, Terminalia superba, a wood of high technological quality, is highly sought-after, which has led to strong pressure on its natural populations throughout its range, including Guinea. The present study assessed the factors determining the use and conservation of the species in Forest Guinea. Specifically, it aimed to i) assess the factors affecting the use values of T. superba, and ii) analyze the socio-economic factors controlling the conservation of Terminalia superba by rural communities. Data were collected on a random sample of 354 people in three prefectures (Lola, Macenta and N'Zérékoré) of Guinée Forestière. The relative frequency of users of the species (all forms of use combined) was calculated, and through a generalized linear model based on the Poisson distribution, the relationship between use values and respondents' socio-economic factors was analyzed. Logistic regression in a step-by-step selection approach was used to identify the factors controlling the retention of Terminalia superba plants in the fields. The relative frequency of use of Terminalia superba was 99.15%. The average number of uses reported per respondent was 1.92, with a coefficient of variation of 49.72%. Of all the factors involved, only gender had a significant effect on the number of uses reported, with men reporting more uses (mean = 1.97 and CV = 48.72%) than women (mean = 1.06 and CV = 22.91%). The final logistic regression model identified variables such as prefecture of residence, time spent in the village over 20 years, monthly income, main source of income, age category, marital status and level of education as factors controlling the retention of Terminalia superba plants by respondents in their fields. This study demonstrates the importance of the species and identifies the socio-economic factors of interest to be considered in programs for its valorization and conservation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminalia superba was used by 99.15% of respondents.

Taxon
Terminalia superbaTerminalia superbae0
Outcome
relative frequency of usee0
Value
99.15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · TaxonOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative frequency of use of Terminalia superba was 99.15%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1279 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Respondents reported an average of 1.92 uses, with 49.72% variation.

Outcome
average number of usese0
Value
1.92e0
Qualifier
coefficient of variation of 49.72%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The average number of uses reported per respondent was 1.92, with a coefficient of variation of 49.72%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1383 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Men reported more uses of Terminalia superba than women.

Outcome
number of uses reportede0
Direction
moree0
Value
mean = 1.97e0
Qualifier
mean = 1.06 and CV = 22.91%e0
Comparator
womene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“only gender had a significant effect on the number of uses reported, with men reporting more uses (mean = 1.97 and CV = 48.72%) than women (mean = 1.06 and CV = 22.91%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1582 · show in text ↑