Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Effects of fertilizer types on growth and bulb yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) varieties in Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Onarinde CR

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is an economically and nutritionally valuable crop widely consumed for its culinary and medicinal benefits. However, its productivity in Nigeria remains low, largely due to suboptimal agronomic practices and limited information on appropriate fertilizer types and varietal differences. This study was therefore conducted to evaluate the influence of different fertilizer types and garlic varieties on the growth, and bulb yield of garlic in Ogbomoso. The treatment consisted of two garlic varieties (Sokoto local and Pretty garlic) and six fertilizer treatments: F1 (No fertilizer), F2 (100% NPK 15-15-15), F3 (100% Compost), F4 (50% NPK + 50% Compost), F5 (75% NPK + 25% Compost), and F6 (75% Compost + 25% NPK). The 2 × 6 factorial experiment was arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD), replicated four times. Data were collected on growth, yield and yield parameters. Data collected were subjected to Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and treatment means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at a 5% significance level. Results showed that Pretty garlic was significantly higher (p≤0.05) in all growth and yield parameters than Sokoto local variety. Although, Sokoto local variety demonstrated more vigorous early growth, with higher numbers of leaves, tillers, clove count per bulb, and greater bulb firmness. Among the fertilizer treatments, 100% compost significantly enhanced (p≤0.05) vegetative growth, while the combination of 50% NPK + 50% compost resulted in the highest bulb yield (138.67 kg/ha). A significant interaction (p≤0.05) was observed between variety and fertilizer type for all data collected, indicating that the response of garlic to fertilizer application is variety-dependent. In conclusion, pretty garlic variety fertilized with integrated application of 100 kg/ha NPK 15:15:15 + 5 tons/ha Tithonia compost were recommended for optimum production of garlic in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretty garlic exceeded Sokoto local in growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Pretty garlice0
Outcome
all growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Sokoto local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that Pretty garlic was significantly higher (p≤0.05) in all growth and yield parameters than Sokoto local variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sokoto local had more vigorous early growth and higher leaf, tiller and clove counts and bulb firmness.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Sokoto local varietye0
Outcome
early growth, with higher numbers of leaves, tillers, clove count per bulb, and greater bulb firmnesse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sokoto local variety demonstrated more vigorous early growth, with higher numbers of leaves, tillers, clove count per bulb, and greater bulb firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full compost enhanced vegetative growth.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
100% composte0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% compost significantly enhanced (p≤0.05) vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half NPK and half compost gave the highest bulb yield of 138.67 kg/ha.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% composte0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
138.67 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% NPK + 50% compost resulted in the highest bulb yield (138.67 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and fertilizer type interacted significantly for all collected outcomes.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
fertilizer typee0
Outcome
all data collectede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant interaction (p≤0.05) was observed between variety and fertilizer type for all data collected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended Pretty garlic with 100 kg/ha NPK 15:15:15 and 5 tons/ha Tithonia compost for optimum local production.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Material
pretty garlic varietye0
Treatment
100 kg/ha NPK 15:15:15 + 5 tons/ha Tithonia composte0
Outcome
optimum production of garlice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretty garlic variety fertilized with integrated application of 100 kg/ha NPK 15:15:15 + 5 tons/ha Tithonia compost were recommended for optimum production of garlic in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.