Paper · 2025 · Samangan Academic & Research Journal

Effects of Irrigation Cutoff and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on the Physiological Traits of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

Mohammad Sadiq Mirzaei; Wali Salari; Khadim Hamdam

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

To investigate the effect of irrigation cutoff and nitrogen fertilizer levels on the yield and yield components of lentil cultivars, a split-plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications at the research farm of Daikundi Higher Education Institution in 2023. The irrigation treatments included four levels: full irrigation (control), irrigation cutoff at the vegetative stage (V4), irrigation cutoff at the flowering stage (R1), and irrigation cutoff at the pod-filling stage (R5). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied as a sub-factor in three levels: no fertilizer, 70 kg nitrogen per hectare, and 140 kg nitrogen per hectare from a urea source. The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils. The application of nitrogen fertilizer, except for leaf relative water content, had a significant positive effect on other traits. On average, the reduction in lentil yield was 14% with irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stage, 6% with normal irrigation, and 10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stage. Based on the results, along with the specific climatic characteristics of Daikundi Province and soil tests in the region, the application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditions is recommended to mitigate the damage caused by water scarcity and improve lentil production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil grain yield.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil dry weight.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil physiological traits.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
Outcome
physiological traitse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer positively affected traits other than leaf relative water content.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
other traitse0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
except for leaf relative water contente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen fertilizer, except for leaf relative water content, had a significant positive effect on other traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage irrigation cutoff was associated with a 14% lentil yield reduction.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stagee0
Outcome
lentil yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in lentil yield was 14% with irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract reports a 6% lentil yield reduction under normal irrigation.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
6% with normal irrigatione0
Value
6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6% with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod-filling-stage irrigation cutoff was associated with a 10% lentil yield reduction.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stagee0
Outcome
10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stagee0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff to mitigate water scarcity damage and improve lentil production.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditions is recommended to mitigate the damage caused by water scarcity and improve lentil production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1426 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.