Abstract
To investigate the effect of irrigation cutoff and nitrogen fertilizer levels on the yield and yield components of lentil cultivars, a split-plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications at the research farm of Daikundi Higher Education Institution in 2023. The irrigation treatments included four levels: full irrigation (control), irrigation cutoff at the vegetative stage (V4), irrigation cutoff at the flowering stage (R1), and irrigation cutoff at the pod-filling stage (R5). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied as a sub-factor in three levels: no fertilizer, 70 kg nitrogen per hectare, and 140 kg nitrogen per hectare from a urea source. The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils. The application of nitrogen fertilizer, except for leaf relative water content, had a significant positive effect on other traits. On average, the reduction in lentil yield was 14% with irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stage, 6% with normal irrigation, and 10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stage. Based on the results, along with the specific climatic characteristics of Daikundi Province and soil tests in the region, the application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditions is recommended to mitigate the damage caused by water scarcity and improve lentil production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil grain yield.
- Taxon
- lentils
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil dry weight.
- Taxon
- lentils
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation cutoff significantly reduced lentil physiological traits.
- Taxon
- lentils
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation cutoff treatmentse0
- Outcome
- physiological traitse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The irrigation cutoff treatments significantly reduced grain yield, dry weight, and physiological traits of lentils.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer positively affected traits other than leaf relative water content.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- other traitse0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Qualifier
- except for leaf relative water contente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The application of nitrogen fertilizer, except for leaf relative water content, had a significant positive effect on other traits.”
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage irrigation cutoff was associated with a 14% lentil yield reduction.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stagee0
- Outcome
- lentil yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 14%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“reduction in lentil yield was 14% with irrigation cutoff during the vegetative stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The abstract reports a 6% lentil yield reduction under normal irrigation.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Outcome
- 6% with normal irrigatione0
- Value
- 6%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“6% with normal irrigation”
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod-filling-stage irrigation cutoff was associated with a 10% lentil yield reduction.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stagee0
- Outcome
- 10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stagee0
- Value
- 10%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“10% with irrigation cutoff during the pod-filling stage”
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff to mitigate water scarcity damage and improve lentil production.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Outcome
- application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the application of 70 kg nitrogen per hectare under irrigation cutoff conditions is recommended to mitigate the damage caused by water scarcity and improve lentil production”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →irrigation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.