Paper · 2025 · Crop Research

Effect of fertilizer doses and foliar application of primary nutrients on growth and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under South Odisha agro-climatic conditions

ROMAN KUMAR MAHTO; RAJESH SHRIRAM KALASARE; MASINA SAIRAM; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the modern era of climate change, the choice of ecologically hardy crops and suitable cropping systems is the top priority. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.), a climate-resilient cereal crop, is crucial for food and fodder security in arid and semi-arid regions. Foliar nutrition is aimed at eliminating the problems of fixation and immobilisation of nutrients. Hence, foliar nutrition is recognised as a significant way of fertilising crops. Nano nutrients have become more efficient than conventional fertilizers and exhibit good results in combination. The present study was conducted at M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, during the Rabi season of 2023-2024. There were four levels of fertilizers (0%, 50%, 100% and 150% of the recommended dose of fertilizers) as the first factor and three foliar nutrient doses, namely, nano urea @ 4ml/L, nano DAP @ 3ml/L and foliar potash @ 2g/L at 30 and 60 DAS. The results revealed that the highest growth attributes, yield parameters and yield were observed in the treatment with the application of 150% RDF. The foliar nutrient application recorded the highest values of the above-mentioned parameters with nano DAP spray @ 3ml/L at 30 and 60 DAS. Among treatment combinations, the fertilizer dose of 150% RDF and nano DAP spray @ 3 ml/L at 30 and 60 DAS registered its superiority for yield attributes and yield. The study concludes that providing grain sorghum with 150% RDF and two foliar sprays of nano DAP at 30 and 60 DAS can be considered the most suitable nutrient management practice for obtaining the highest productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% RDF treatment gave the highest growth attributes, yield parameters and yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150% RDFe0
Outcome
growth attributes, yield parameters and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest growth attributes, yield parameters and yield were observed in the treatment with the application of 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano DAP spray produced the highest growth and yield parameter values among foliar treatments.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
nano DAP spray @ 3ml/L at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
highest values of the above-mentioned parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar nutrient application recorded the highest values of the above-mentioned parameters with nano DAP spray @ 3ml/L at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 150% RDF and nano DAP spray was superior for yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150% RDF and nano DAP spray @ 3 ml/L at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer dose of 150% RDF and nano DAP spray @ 3 ml/L at 30 and 60 DAS registered its superiority for yield attributes and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 150% RDF and two nano DAP sprays at 30 and 60 DAS for highest productivity.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
150% RDF and two foliar sprays of nano DAP at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
most suitable nutrient management practice for obtaining the highest productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“providing grain sorghum with 150% RDF and two foliar sprays of nano DAP at 30 and 60 DAS can be considered the most suitable nutrient management practice for obtaining the highest productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1649 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.