Paper · 2025 · Agronomy Journal

Rye performance in central Iowa under different seeding and nitrogen fertilizer rates

Cecilia Crespo; Robert W. Malone; Anna Radke; et al.

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The inclusion of a harvested winter cereal before soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can increase productivity and sustainability of a cereal‐soybean rotation. Still, literature disagrees on proper seeding and fertilizer rates of the winter cereal for efficient production of both crops in the rotation. This study aimed to evaluate rye ( Secale cereale L.) spring green ground cover, biomass production, and nitrogen (N) accumulation in a rye‐soybean rotation, using three seeding rates (20, 40, and 60 kg ha −1 ) and three N rates (0, 30, and 60 kg N ha −1 ) from 2021 to 2023 in central Iowa. Remote sensing was used to assess rye growth. Green ground cover was up to 42% higher in the highest seeding rate (60 kg ha −1 ). Conversely, rye biomass production was not affected by seeding or N rates and averaged 3.0 ± 1.1 and 4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1 in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. Rye N accumulation increased 0.13 and 0.51 kg N ha −1 for each kg N applied in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. Soybean yield was similar among treatments but 19%–38% lower than the county average production, especially in the second growing season due to limited precipitation. This study provides new evidence that rye biomass production can be optimized with low inputs, whereas higher seeding rates increase spring green ground cover. However, because of reduced soybean yields, further studies are needed to evaluate rye harvest time and alternative soybean varieties to optimize soybean production after rye for central Iowa conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest seeding rate increased rye green ground cover by up to 42%.

Treatment
highest seeding rate (60 kg ha −1 )e0
Outcome
Green ground covere0
Direction
highere0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green ground cover was up to 42% higher in the highest seeding rate (60 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye biomass production was unaffected by seeding or N rates.

Treatment
seeding or N ratese0
Outcome
rye biomass productione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye biomass production was not affected by seeding or N rates and averaged 3.0 ± 1.1 and 4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1 in the first and second growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye biomass averaged 3.0 ± 1.1 Mg ha −1 in the first season.

Outcome
rye biomass productione0
Value
3.0 ± 1.1e0
Qualifier
firste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye biomass production was not affected by seeding or N rates and averaged 3.0 ± 1.1 and 4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1 in the first and second growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye biomass averaged 4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1 in the second season.

Outcome
rye biomass productione0
Value
4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
second growing seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye biomass production was not affected by seeding or N rates and averaged 3.0 ± 1.1 and 4.9 ± 1.3 Mg ha −1 in the first and second growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–907 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye N accumulation rose 0.13 kg N ha −1 per kg N applied in the first season.

Treatment
kg N appliede0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.13e0
Qualifier
firste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rye N accumulation increased 0.13 and 0.51 kg N ha −1 for each kg N applied in the first and second growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye N accumulation rose 0.51 kg N ha −1 per kg N applied in the second season.

Treatment
kg N appliede0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.51 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
second growing seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rye N accumulation increased 0.13 and 0.51 kg N ha −1 for each kg N applied in the first and second growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was similar among treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Soybean yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield was similar among treatments but 19%–38% lower than the county average production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was 19%–38% below the county average.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Soybean yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
19%–38%e0
Comparator
county average productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield was similar among treatments but 19%–38% lower than the county average production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating rye harvest time and soybean varieties to improve soybean production after rye.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
evaluate rye harvest time and alternative soybean varieties to optimize soybean production after ryee0
Setting
central Iowae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further studies are needed to evaluate rye harvest time and alternative soybean varieties to optimize soybean production after rye for central Iowa conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1569 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.