Paper · 2008 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Cotton Nitrogen Management in a High‐Residue Conservation System: Cover Crop Fertilization

M. S. Reiter; D. W. Reeves; C. H. Burmester; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen is required for adequate residue production from cereal cover crops used in no‐till cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production, but residues can immobilize N needed by cotton. We conducted a 3‐yr field study on a Decatur silt loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudult) in northern Alabama to test N fertilizer practices for cotton grown with a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop and conservation tillage. Nitrogen rates applied to the rye cover crop were 0, 34, and 67 kg N ha −1 and cotton N rates were 0, 45, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 Additionally, 15 N microplots were established in cover crop N treatments of 34 kg N ha −1 and in cotton treatments of 90 kg N ha −1 Data collected included cover crop aerial biomass, cover crop C/N ratios, cotton leaf N at first flower, lint yield, lint quality, and 15 N in plant and soil samples. Cotton grown in unfertilized rye treatments needed 57 to 60% (38–40 kg N ha −1 ) more N to maximize yields above median conventional tillage N recommendations (67 kg N ha −1 ). Cover crop N rates of 67 kg N ha −1 maximized cover crop biomass production for soil protection and soil organic matter aggradation. If the cover crop was fertilized, minimum cotton N applications of 70 and 76 kg N ha −1 were needed for economic optimum and maximum lint yield, respectively. We speculate that cotton N rates may be decreased in the future as new N and C pool equilibria are reached.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton following unfertilized rye required 57 to 60% more nitrogen than the conventional recommendation to maximize yield.

Treatment
unfertilized rye treatmentse0
Outcome
N to maximize yieldse0
Direction
moree0
Value
57 to 60%e0
Qualifier
38–40 kg N ha −1e0
Comparator
median conventional tillage N recommendationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton grown in unfertilized rye treatments needed 57 to 60% (38–40 kg N ha −1 ) more N to maximize yields above median conventional tillage N recommendations (67 kg N ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 67 kg N ha −1 to the rye cover crop maximized its biomass production.

Treatment
Cover crop N rates of 67 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
cover crop biomass productione0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop N rates of 67 kg N ha −1 maximized cover crop biomass production for soil protection and soil organic matter aggradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover Crop Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized-cover-crop cotton needed at least 70 kg N ha −1 for economic optimum lint yield.

Outcome
economic optimume0
Value
70e0
Qualifier
kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If the cover crop was fertilized, minimum cotton N applications of 70 and 76 kg N ha −1 were needed for economic optimum and maximum lint yield, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized-cover-crop cotton needed at least 76 kg N ha −1 for maximum lint yield.

Outcome
maximum lint yielde0
Value
76 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
If the cover crop was fertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If the cover crop was fertilized, minimum cotton N applications of 70 and 76 kg N ha −1 were needed for economic optimum and maximum lint yield, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.