Paper · 2024 · Field Crops Research

Thermal time and precipitation dictate cereal rye shoot biomass production

Cecilia Crespo; Peter L. O’Brien; Sabrina J. Ruis; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Maximizing cover crop biomass production is key to agroecosystem service delivery. Cover crop biomass accumulation is particularly important in corn ( Zea mays L.) silage cropping systems due to the high rate of crop biomass removal that leaves the soil surface mostly bare from early fall until planting the following spring. We evaluated how weather factors affect rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop shoot biomass in different rotations including corn silage and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and their influence on soybean and corn silage yields. In a 13-year field study in a corn silage-soybean rotation, we assessed rye biomass and main crop yields when rye was planted after one or both main crops every year. Rye after silage produced 1.98 Mg ha −1 more shoot biomass than rye after soybean. Thermal time (expressed as growing degree days) had a greater impact than precipitation on the shoot biomass of rye cover crop. A threshold of 800 growing degree days (0°C base) in the fall was determined, above which final biomass was not limited by fall thermal time (R 2 =0.58). Rye biomass was most strongly affected by fall thermal time (below 800 growing degree days) after soybean and by spring growing degree days and precipitation after corn silage. Rye cover crop inclusion did not decrease corn silage and soybean yields in 12 out of 13 years. Fall growing degree days below a threshold may limit the maximum potential for spring rye cover crop growth, but spring growing degree days or precipitation may prevent maximum growth from occurring when exceeding 800 growing degree days. Planting rye cover crops in both phases of the rotation did not affect cover crop biomass or main crop yields and may hold a greater potential to protect the soil than planting after only one crop in the rotation. Cropping systems that allow a rye cover crop to be planted early enough to accumulate 800 growing degree days in the fall have the best potential for high cover crop biomass production. • We studied GDD and precipitation effects on cereal rye cover crop biomass planted after corn silage and soybean harvest. • Rye after corn silage produced on average 1.98 Mg ha −1 more shoot biomass than rye after soybean. • Final biomass was not limited by fall GDD when more than 800 GDD were accumulated in the fall. • Rye biomass was most strongly affected by fall GDD after soybean and by spring GDD after corn silage. • Rye cover crop inclusion decreased corn silage and soybean yields in only one of 13 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye planted after corn silage produced 1.98 Mg ha −1 more shoot biomass than rye after soybean.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
Rye after silagee1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
moree1
Value
1.98 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
rye after soybeane1
Setting
fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rye after silage produced 1.98 Mg ha −1 more shoot biomass than rye after soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–803 · show in text ↑
e2

“In a 13-year field study in a corn silage-soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thermal time (growing degree days) had a greater impact than precipitation on rye cover crop shoot biomass.

Treatment
Thermal time (expressed as growing degree days)e3
Outcome
shoot biomasse3
Comparator
precipitatione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Thermal time (expressed as growing degree days) had a greater impact than precipitation on the shoot biomass of rye cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–931 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye biomass was most strongly affected by fall thermal time (below 800 growing degree days) after soybean.

Treatment
fall thermal time (below 800 growing degree days)e4
Outcome
biomasse4
Qualifier
after soybeane4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rye biomass was most strongly affected by fall thermal time (below 800 growing degree days) after soybean and by spring growing degree days and precipitation after corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1262 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye biomass was most strongly affected by spring growing degree days and precipitation after corn silage.

Treatment
spring growing degree days and precipitatione4
Outcome
biomasse4
Qualifier
after corn silagee4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rye biomass was most strongly affected by fall thermal time (below 800 growing degree days) after soybean and by spring growing degree days and precipitation after corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1262 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A fall threshold of 800 growing degree days (0°C base) was determined, above which final rye biomass was not limited by fall thermal time (R2 = 0.58).

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
fall thermal timee5
Outcome
final biomasse5
Value
R 2 =0.58e5
Qualifier
threshold of 800 growing degree days (0°C base)e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“A threshold of 800 growing degree days (0°C base) in the fall was determined, above which final biomass was not limited by fall thermal time (R 2 =0.58)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1085 · show in text ↑
e0

“rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–416 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rye planted early enough to accumulate 800 growing degree days in the fall has the best potential for high cover crop biomass production.

Taxon
rye cover crope1
Treatment
planted early enough to accumulate 800 growing degree days in the falle1
Outcome
high cover crop biomass productione1

Verbatim

e1

“Cropping systems that allow a rye cover crop to be planted early enough to accumulate 800 growing degree days in the fall have the best potential for high cover crop biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye cover crop inclusion did not decrease corn silage and soybean yields in 12 of 13 years.

Taxon
corn silage and soybeane6
Treatment
Rye cover crop inclusione6
Outcome
corn silage and soybean yieldse6
Direction
did not decreasee6
Value
12 out of 13 yearse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Rye cover crop inclusion did not decrease corn silage and soybean yields in 12 out of 13 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting rye cover crops in both phases of the rotation did not affect cover crop biomass or main crop yields.

Treatment
Planting rye cover crops in both phases of the rotatione7
Outcome
cover crop biomass or main crop yieldse7
Direction
did not affecte7
Comparator
planting after only one crop in the rotatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Planting rye cover crops in both phases of the rotation did not affect cover crop biomass or main crop yields and may hold a greater potential to protect the soil than planting after only one crop in the rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1811 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cover crop · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

rotation · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.