Paper · 2012 · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University)

An Integrated Modeling and Data Management Strategy for Cellulosic Biomass Production Decisions

Joshua Koch; David J. Muth; Kenneth M. Bryden

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Emerging cellulosic bioenergy markets can provide land managers with additional options for crop production decisions. For example, integrating dedicated bioenergy crops such as perennial grasses and short rotation woody species within the agricultural landscape can have positive impacts on several environmental processes including increased soil organic matter in degraded soils, reduced sediment and nutrient loading in watersheds, and lower green house gas fluxes. Implementing this type of diverse bioenergy production system to maximize the potential environmental benefits requires a detailed understanding of the many interwoven aspects of environmental landscapes. This paper presents a dynamic framework-based integrated modeling and data management strategy that can design sustainable bioenergy cropping systems within the existing row crop production landscape of the Midwestern U.S. Critical environmental processes— including soil erosion from wind and water, and soil organic matter changes—are quantified by this integrated model to determine sustainable removal rates of agricultural residues for bioenergy production at the sub-field scale. Seven land management options for a 59 ha Iowa field are examined using the integrated model. These include a baseline case of sustainable residue removal and various incorporations of rye cover cropping and switchgrass use in marginal land. Relative to the baseline metrics, the adoption of rye cover crops with sustainable residue removal increases the total biomass sustainably available for biofuel production by 289% and reduces soil loss by 42%. Combining rye cover crops while displacing less productive and at-risk areas of the field with switchgrass increases the sustainable biomass available by 436% and decreases soil loss by 64%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Rye cover crops with sustainable residue removal increased sustainable biomass available for biofuel by 289% versus baseline.

Treatment
adoption of rye cover crops with sustainable residue removale0
Outcome
total biomass sustainably available for biofuel productione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
289%e0
Comparator
baseline metricse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the baseline metrics, the adoption of rye cover crops with sustainable residue removal increases the total biomass sustainably available for biofuel production by 289%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Rye cover crops with sustainable residue removal reduced soil loss by 42% versus baseline.

Treatment
adoption of rye cover crops with sustainable residue removale0
Outcome
soil losse0
Direction
reducese0
Value
42%e0
Comparator
baseline metricse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the baseline metrics, the adoption of rye cover crops with sustainable residue removal increases the total biomass sustainably available for biofuel production by 289% and reduces soil loss by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combining rye cover crops with switchgrass in less productive at-risk field areas increased sustainable biomass availability by 436%.

Treatment
Combining rye cover crops while displacing less productive and at-risk areas of the field with switchgrasse0
Outcome
sustainable biomass availablee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
436%e0
Comparator
baseline metricse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining rye cover crops while displacing less productive and at-risk areas of the field with switchgrass increases the sustainable biomass available by 436%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1771 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to the baseline metrics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combining rye cover crops with switchgrass in less productive at-risk field areas decreased soil loss by 64%.

Treatment
Combining rye cover crops while displacing less productive and at-risk areas of the field with switchgrasse0
Outcome
soil losse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining rye cover crops while displacing less productive and at-risk areas of the field with switchgrass increases the sustainable biomass available by 436% and decreases soil loss by 64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1802 · show in text ↑

cover crop · soil: physics · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cover crop · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cover crop · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.