Paper · 2017 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Cowpea as a Multifunctional Legume in a Texas Double Cropping System

Melanie L Aiosa

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cropping systems involving legumes are increasing due to the costs and environmental concerns attributed to N fertilizer. A green manure cover crop in a cropping system can benefit the soil by improving fertility and disrupting disease, insect or weed cycles. Two studies were conducted during two years at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Overton, TX. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp) was evaluated as a multifunctional legume in a double cropping system with forage rye (Secale cereale L.), and 37 cowpea plant introduction (CPI) lines were evaluated for seed and biomass production. These studies measured cowpea biomass production, seed yield, carbon and nitrogen plant concentrations, and soil N contributions. Primary objectives were to 1) maximize rye biomass production through the incorporation of cowpea biomass in combination with different nitrogen rates concurrently; and 2) evaluate new CPI lines for traits needed in the cropping system and for potential seed production. The green manure cover crop of cowpea showed no impact (P ≥ 0.34) compared to fallow plots when comparing rye biomass in 2015 and in 2016 (P ≥ 0.26). Nitrogen rates had a positive linear relationship with rye biomass for 2015 (r^2=0.79) and 2016 (r^2=0.97). The lack of response of soil N from the summer green manure cover crop may be likely due to the soil type. Darco loamy fine sand (loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Grossarenic Paleudult), is an excessively drained soil and has very little nutrient holding capacity. The CPI lines were evaluated based on biomass production and seed yield by late September to incorporate into a cropping system with forage rye, and nematode resistance. Cowpea biomass production peaked at 3021 kg ha^-1 in 2015 and at 6009 kg ha^-1 in 2016. Cowpea seed yield ranged from 0 to 2322 kg ha^-1 in 2016 and 9 to 351 kg ha^-1 in 2015. One CPI line was identified with root-knot nematode resistance. Separately the CPI lines exhibited valuable traits such as biomass production, seed yield, and nematode resistance and will be further evaluated for additional breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea green manure did not significantly change rye biomass relative to fallow in 2015.

Treatment
green manure cover crop of cowpeae0
Outcome
rye biomasse0
Direction
no impacte0
Value
P ≥ 0.34e0
Comparator
fallow plotse0
Setting
2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The green manure cover crop of cowpea showed no impact (P ≥ 0.34) compared to fallow plots when comparing rye biomass in 2015 and in 2016 (P ≥ 0.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea green manure did not significantly change rye biomass relative to fallow in 2016.

Treatment
green manure cover crop of cowpeae0
Outcome
rye biomasse0
Direction
no impacte0
Value
P ≥ 0.26e0
Comparator
fallow plotse0
Setting
2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The green manure cover crop of cowpea showed no impact (P ≥ 0.34) compared to fallow plots when comparing rye biomass in 2015 and in 2016 (P ≥ 0.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate was positively related to rye biomass in 2015.

Treatment
Nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
rye biomasse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r^2=0.79e0
Setting
2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rates had a positive linear relationship with rye biomass for 2015 (r^2=0.79) and 2016 (r^2=0.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1270 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate was positively related to rye biomass in 2016.

Treatment
Nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
rye biomasse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r^2=0.97e0
Setting
2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rates had a positive linear relationship with rye biomass for 2015 (r^2=0.79) and 2016 (r^2=0.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1270 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea biomass production peaked at 3021 kg ha^-1 in 2015.

Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
peakede0
Value
3021 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea biomass production peaked at 3021 kg ha^-1 in 2015 and at 6009 kg ha^-1 in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea biomass production peaked at 6009 kg ha^-1 in 2016.

Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
peakede0
Value
6009 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea biomass production peaked at 3021 kg ha^-1 in 2015 and at 6009 kg ha^-1 in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seed yield ranged from 0 to 2322 kg ha^-1 in 2016.

Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
rangede0
Value
0 to 2322 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea seed yield ranged from 0 to 2322 kg ha^-1 in 2016 and 9 to 351 kg ha^-1 in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seed yield ranged from 9 to 351 kg ha^-1 in 2015.

Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
rangede0
Value
9 to 351 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea seed yield ranged from 0 to 2322 kg ha^-1 in 2016 and 9 to 351 kg ha^-1 in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One cowpea introduction line had root-knot nematode resistance.

Material
CPI linee0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
root-knot nematode resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One CPI line was identified with root-knot nematode resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors plan further evaluation of cowpea lines for breeding.

Outcome
will be further evaluated for additional breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“the CPI lines exhibited valuable traits such as biomass production, seed yield, and nematode resistance and will be further evaluated for additional breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2129 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

cover crop · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.