Paper · 2025 · Irrigation and Drainage

IoT‐Based Smart Fertigation Scheduling and Wireless Microclimate Monitoring for a Greenhouse Dutch Bucket Hydroponic System

Murtaza Hasan; Adarsha Gopalakrishna Bhat; Vinod Kumar S; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Precision irrigation and fertigation using IoT‐based decision‐making tools have proven effective in optimizing real‐time nutrient solutions for agricultural production. IoT is essential for real‐time sensor monitoring and for wirelessly activating fertigation and irrigation systems. Soilless or hydroponic culture presents a viable alternative to traditional soil‐based cultivation. This study evaluated an IoT‐based fertigation system for soilless Dutch bucket hydroponic cucumber production in field experiments conducted from August to October 2023 and 2024. Two treatments were compared: conventional soil‐based cultivation (Drip irrigation at 100% ETc) and IoT‐enabled Dutch bucket hydroponics. The system monitored crop microclimate and automated fertigation, applying nutrients when EC was ≤ 2.5 dS/m and turning off at ≥ 4 dS/m. Crop performance parameters were assessed, including plant height, leaf area, root volume, yield and water productivity. Results showed that the IoT‐enabled hydroponic system produced significantly higher yields than traditional soil‐based cultivation. Yield and water productivity increased by 7% and 53%, respectively, with 12% less irrigation water. While testing under protected cultivation, the system's waterproof design indicates its suitability for outdoor conditions. The IoT system effectively records and displays environmental and fertigation data via the cloud, enabling fully automated fertigation and minimizing human intervention.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IoT hydroponics increased cucumber yield by 7% over soil cultivation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
IoT‐enabled hydroponic systeme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
traditional soil‐based cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the IoT‐enabled hydroponic system produced significantly higher yields than traditional soil‐based cultivation. Yield and water productivity increased by 7% and 53%, respectively, with 12% less irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless Dutch bucket hydroponic cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IoT hydroponics changed cucumber water productivity by 53%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
IoT‐enabled hydroponic systeme0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53%e0
Comparator
traditional soil‐based cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the IoT‐enabled hydroponic system produced significantly higher yields than traditional soil‐based cultivation. Yield and water productivity increased by 7% and 53%, respectively, with 12% less irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless Dutch bucket hydroponic cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IoT hydroponics changed cucumber irrigation water by 12%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
IoT‐enabled hydroponic systeme0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
traditional soil‐based cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the IoT‐enabled hydroponic system produced significantly higher yields than traditional soil‐based cultivation. Yield and water productivity increased by 7% and 53%, respectively, with 12% less irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless Dutch bucket hydroponic cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–502 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IoT system records and displays environmental and fertigation data via the cloud, enabling automated fertigation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
records and displays environmental and fertigation datae0
Qualifier
enabling fully automated fertigation and minimizing human interventione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The IoT system effectively records and displays environmental and fertigation data via the cloud, enabling fully automated fertigation and minimizing human intervention.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless Dutch bucket hydroponic cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–502 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cultivation system · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.