Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of plant spacing and fertigation on growth of chilli type Keshori local

Jadhav GB; YB Dharmik; VU Raut; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment entitled ‘‘Effect of plant spacing and fertigation on growth of chilli type Keshori local.’’ was carried at RFRS, Katol, District Nagpur in 2024-2025. Variety Keshori is studied under this experiment. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with twelve treatment combinations replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of four levels of plant spacing viz., S1- 60cm × 60cm, S2- 60cm × 45cm, S3- 60cm × 30cm and S4- 45cm × 45cm and three levels of fertigation viz., F1- Application of RDF with traditional method, F2- Application of 100% RDF through drip and F3- Application of 80% RDF through drip. Result of an experiment revealed that, maximum plant height was recorded under the spacing S3, while maximum plant spread, number of primary branches, fruit length and fruit breadth was recorded under the spacing S1. All the growth parameters were recorded maximum under fertigation level F2. The interaction effect of plant spacing and fertigation on plant height was recorded maximum under treatment combination S3F2. Maximum plant spread, number of primary branches per plant, fruit length and fruit breadth were recorded under treatment combination S1F2. The characters such as Days to flower initiation, Days to 50% flowering and duration of crop was found non-significant due to the effect of plant spacing and fertigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing S3 produced maximum plant height.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
spacing S3e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant height was recorded under the spacing S3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing S1 produced maximum plant spread and number of primary branches.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
spacing S1e0
Outcome
plant spread, number of primary branchese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant spread, number of primary branches, fruit length and fruit breadth was recorded under the spacing S1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing S1 produced maximum fruit length and breadth.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
spacing S1e0
Outcome
fruit length and fruit breadthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant spread, number of primary branches, fruit length and fruit breadth was recorded under the spacing S1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F2 maximized all measured growth parameters.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
fertigation level F2e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the growth parameters were recorded maximum under fertigation level F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S3F2 combination produced maximum plant height.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
treatment combination S3F2e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect of plant spacing and fertigation on plant height was recorded maximum under treatment combination S3F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S1F2 combination produced maximum plant spread and primary branch number.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
treatment combination S1F2e0
Outcome
plant spread, number of primary branches per plante0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant spread, number of primary branches per plant, fruit length and fruit breadth were recorded under treatment combination S1F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S1F2 combination produced maximum fruit length and breadth.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
treatment combination S1F2e0
Outcome
fruit length and fruit breadthe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant spread, number of primary branches per plant, fruit length and fruit breadth were recorded under treatment combination S1F2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and fertigation effects on flower initiation, 50% flowering, and crop duration were not statistically significant.

Taxon
chillit0
Material
Keshori localt0
Treatment
plant spacing and fertigatione0
Outcome
Days to flower initiation, Days to 50% flowering and duration of crope0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“chilli type Keshori local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Days to flower initiation, Days to 50% flowering and duration of crop was found non-significant due to the effect of plant spacing and fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1368 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 90 positive, 5 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

density · phenology · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

density · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.