Abstract
Leafy vegetables contributes to the inflation rate in Ambon City due to low productivity in rainy season. Some vegetables are imported from other islands while importantvegetables such as local petsai (Brassica chinensis L.) and chili (Capsicum annum L.) are cultivated in low nitrogen soil, Entisols. Lack of nitrogen could be overcome by using inorganic fertilizeras well as biofertilzer. The soil can be inoculated with rhizobacteria, such as Azotobacter, to increase the nitrogen uptake and improve the quality of vegetables. This research was conducted to isolate and select Azotobacter from rhizosphere of vegetables and to examine the effect of Azotobacter inoculation on chili-seedling growth and nitrogen uptake by using bioassay method. Azotobacter sp. was isolated in nitrogen-free Ashby’s Media. The bioassay was held in the green house with randomized block design experiment, which examined the combination of isolates and population of Azotobacter sp. on chili. Two best isolates which was selected based on pH, nitrogen content and cell viability were s2a10 (from petsai's rhizosphere) and c2a9 (from chili’s rhizosphere). Bioassay showed that Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake. All Azotobacter 8 -1inoculation except 10 CFU mL s2a10 maintain soil nitrogen although Azotobacter population in soil was slightly reduced. This showed that Azotobacter sp. potentially reduce the use of inorganic biofertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Isolates s2a10 and c2a9 were selected as the best isolates.
Verbatim
t0“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”
e0“Two best isolates which was selected based on pH, nitrogen content and cell viability were s2a10 (from petsai's rhizosphere) and c2a9 (from chili’s rhizosphere)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation with reduced NPK fertilizer had no effect on transplant dry weight.
- Taxon
- Chilit0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer dosese0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- transplant dry weighte0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”
e0“Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation with reduced NPK fertilizer had no effect on nitrogen uptake.
- Taxon
- Chilit0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer dosese0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- nitrogen uptakee0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”
e0“Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Most Azotobacter inoculations maintained soil nitrogen despite a slight reduction in soil Azotobacter population.
- Taxon
- Chilit0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter 8 -1inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- soil nitrogene0
- Direction
- maintaine0
- Qualifier
- except 10 CFU mL s2a10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”
e0“All Azotobacter 8 -1inoculation except 10 CFU mL s2a10 maintain soil nitrogen although Azotobacter population in soil was slightly reduced”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →inoculation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →fertilization · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
91 papers more in this group
See all 95 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.