Paper · 2016 · Microbiology Indonesia

Selection and Bioassay of Azotobacter sp. Isolates to Improve Growth of Chili (Capsicum annum L.) on Entisols in Ambon

REGINAWANTI HINDERSAH; PRIYANKA PRIYANKA; WILHELMINA RUMAHLEWANG; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Leafy vegetables contributes to the inflation rate in Ambon City due to low productivity in rainy season. Some vegetables are imported from other islands while importantvegetables such as local petsai (Brassica chinensis L.) and chili (Capsicum annum L.) are cultivated in low nitrogen soil, Entisols. Lack of nitrogen could be overcome by using inorganic fertilizeras well as biofertilzer. The soil can be inoculated with rhizobacteria, such as Azotobacter, to increase the nitrogen uptake and improve the quality of vegetables. This research was conducted to isolate and select Azotobacter from rhizosphere of vegetables and to examine the effect of Azotobacter inoculation on chili-seedling growth and nitrogen uptake by using bioassay method. Azotobacter sp. was isolated in nitrogen-free Ashby’s Media. The bioassay was held in the green house with randomized block design experiment, which examined the combination of isolates and population of Azotobacter sp. on chili. Two best isolates which was selected based on pH, nitrogen content and cell viability were s2a10 (from petsai's rhizosphere) and c2a9 (from chili’s rhizosphere). Bioassay showed that Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake. All Azotobacter 8 -1inoculation except 10 CFU mL s2a10 maintain soil nitrogen although Azotobacter population in soil was slightly reduced. This showed that Azotobacter sp. potentially reduce the use of inorganic biofertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates s2a10 and c2a9 were selected as the best isolates.

Taxon
Chilit0
Outcome
Two best isolatese0
Qualifier
based on pH, nitrogen content and cell viabilitye0

Verbatim

t0

“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two best isolates which was selected based on pH, nitrogen content and cell viability were s2a10 (from petsai's rhizosphere) and c2a9 (from chili’s rhizosphere)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation with reduced NPK fertilizer had no effect on transplant dry weight.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer dosese0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
transplant dry weighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation with reduced NPK fertilizer had no effect on nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer dosese0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter inoculation followed by reduced NPK fertilizer doses had no effect on transplant dry weight and nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most Azotobacter inoculations maintained soil nitrogen despite a slight reduction in soil Azotobacter population.

Taxon
Chilit0
Treatment
Azotobacter 8 -1inoculatione0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
soil nitrogene0
Direction
maintaine0
Qualifier
except 10 CFU mL s2a10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chili (Capsicum annum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“All Azotobacter 8 -1inoculation except 10 CFU mL s2a10 maintain soil nitrogen although Azotobacter population in soil was slightly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1423 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 48 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

fertilization · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 90 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.