Paper · 2020 · Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan

Kombinasi Pupuk Kandang Sapi, Asam Humat Dan Mikoriza Terhadap Infeksi Akar Bermikoriza Tanaman Cabai Dan Ketersediaan Unsur Hara Tanah Udipsamments

M. Zayin Sukri; Refa Firgiyanto; Vega Kartika Sari; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This research is an experimental study that aims to examine the combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhizae to increase mycorrhizal infections in the roots of chili plants in the Udipsamments soil in Puger District, Jember Regency, which was carried out in May-November 2018. The research design used was a factorial complete randomized block design with 3 factors that were repeated 3 times. The first factor is cattle manure (0 tons / ha, 10 tons / ha, 20 tons / ha), the second factor is humic acid (0 ppm / ha, 200 ppm / ha), and the third factor is mycorrhiza (0 g / plant , 30 g / plant). The results showed that the combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculants to chili plant roots was able to increase the root mycorrhizal infection of chili plants and increase the nutrients available in the soil by 191.84% for nitrogen and 392.93% for phosphorus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manure, humic acid and mycorrhiza inoculants increased chili root mycorrhizal infection.

Taxon
chili plantse0
Treatment
combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculantse0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
root mycorrhizal infectione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculants to chili plant roots was able to increase the root mycorrhizal infection of chili plants and increase the nutrients available in the soil by 191.84% for nitrogen and 392.93% for phosphorus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments increased soil nitrogen availability by 191.84%.

Taxon
chili plantse0
Treatment
combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculantse0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
nutrients available in the soile0
Direction
increasee0
Value
191.84%e0
Qualifier
nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculants to chili plant roots was able to increase the root mycorrhizal infection of chili plants and increase the nutrients available in the soil by 191.84% for nitrogen and 392.93% for phosphorus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendments increased soil phosphorus availability by 392.93%.

Taxon
chili plantse0
Treatment
combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculantse0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
nutrients available in the soile0
Direction
increasee0
Value
392.93%e0
Qualifier
phosphoruse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the combination of cattle manure, humic acid, and mycorrhiza inoculants to chili plant roots was able to increase the root mycorrhizal infection of chili plants and increase the nutrients available in the soil by 191.84% for nitrogen and 392.93% for phosphorus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–894 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.