Paper · 2019 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Evaluating the effects of formulated nano-NPK slow release fertilizer composite on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum

Kiplangat Rop; George N. Karuku; Damaris Mbui; et al.

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Effect of formulated slow release NPK fertilizer [cellulose-graft-poly(acrylamide)/nanohydroxyapatite/soluble fertilizer] composite (SRF) on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum was evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. No significant difference in growth parameters was observed between SRF and commercial fertilizer (CF) treatments. SRF recorded higher dry matter and yields relative to CF with similar application rates, though statistically insignificant. P deficiency was observed in maize at lowest SRF application rate of 45-57-17. N deficiency in CF was observed at the 8th week, but not in SRF with similar application rates during the same period. Kale showed both N and P deficiencies in the 7th week, while capsicum alone showed N deficiency in the 14th week in SRF at low application rates. NPK content in both maize and kale tissues, was significant between the amendments and control. Capsicum tissues had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher N content both in SRF and CF higher application rates of 125-159-45 & 100-100-100, respectively, compared to control. At final harvest, soil samples planted with maize and amended with the highest SRF rate showed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher P content, compared to lower rates and the control. The agronomic optimal rate of SRF determined by quadratic function were found to be higher than that of CF. SRF was found to enhance growth and yields of crops just like CF and could potentially have greater benefits such as improving soil health and resilience. Keywords: Nano-composite NPK, Slow release fertilizer, Growth and yield, Maize, Kale, Capsicum

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in growth parameters was observed between the slow release fertilizer and commercial fertilizer in maize, kale and capsicum.

Treatment
formulated slow release NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
commercial fertilizer (CF)e0
Setting
greenhouse experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effect of formulated slow release NPK fertilizer [cellulose-graft-poly(acrylamide)/nanohydroxyapatite/soluble fertilizer] composite (SRF) on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum was evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. No significant difference in growth parameters was observed between SRF and commercial fertilizer (CF) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The slow release fertilizer recorded higher dry matter and yields than commercial fertilizer, though statistically insignificant.

Treatment
formulated slow release NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
dry matter and yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
statistically insignificante1
Comparator
CFe1
Setting
greenhouse experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effect of formulated slow release NPK fertilizer [cellulose-graft-poly(acrylamide)/nanohydroxyapatite/soluble fertilizer] composite (SRF) on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum was evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. No significant difference in growth parameters was observed between SRF and commercial fertilizer (CF) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRF recorded higher dry matter and yields relative to CF with similar application rates, though statistically insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P deficiency was observed in maize at the lowest slow release fertilizer application rate of 45-57-17.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
lowest SRF application rate of 45-57-17e2
Outcome
P deficiencye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“P deficiency was observed in maize at lowest SRF application rate of 45-57-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N deficiency was observed in commercial fertilizer treated plants at the 8th week.

Treatment
CFe3
Outcome
N deficiencye3
Qualifier
at the 8th weeke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“N deficiency in CF was observed at the 8th week, but not in SRF with similar application rates during the same period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No N deficiency was observed in slow release fertilizer treated plants at similar application rates at the 8th week.

Treatment
SRFe3
Outcome
N deficiencye3
Qualifier
similar application ratese3
Comparator
CFe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“N deficiency in CF was observed at the 8th week, but not in SRF with similar application rates during the same period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kale showed both N and P deficiencies in the 7th week.

Outcome
N and P deficienciese4
Qualifier
in the 7th weeke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Kale showed both N and P deficiencies in the 7th week, while capsicum alone showed N deficiency in the 14th week in SRF at low application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsicum alone showed N deficiency in the 14th week under slow release fertilizer at low application rates.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume4
Treatment
SRF at low application ratese4
Outcome
N deficiencye4
Qualifier
in the 14th weeke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Kale showed both N and P deficiencies in the 7th week, while capsicum alone showed N deficiency in the 14th week in SRF at low application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK content in maize tissues differed significantly between the amendments and the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Organ / stage
tissuese5
Treatment
amendmentse5
Outcome
NPK contente5
Comparator
controle5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“NPK content in both maize and kale tissues, was significant between the amendments and control. Capsicum tissues had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher N content both in SRF and CF higher application rates of 125-159-45 & 100-100-100, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK content in kale tissues differed significantly between the amendments and the control.

Organ / stage
tissuese5
Treatment
amendmentse5
Outcome
NPK contente5
Comparator
controle5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“NPK content in both maize and kale tissues, was significant between the amendments and control. Capsicum tissues had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher N content both in SRF and CF higher application rates of 125-159-45 & 100-100-100, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsicum tissues had significantly higher N content under slow release fertilizer at higher application rates of 125-159-45 than under the control.

Taxon
CapsicumCapsicume5
Organ / stage
tissuese5
Treatment
SRFe5
Outcome
N contente5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
higher application rates of 125-159-45e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“NPK content in both maize and kale tissues, was significant between the amendments and control. Capsicum tissues had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher N content both in SRF and CF higher application rates of 125-159-45 & 100-100-100, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsicum tissues had significantly higher N content under commercial fertilizer at higher application rates of 100-100-100 than under the control.

Taxon
CapsicumCapsicume5
Organ / stage
tissuese5
Treatment
CFe5
Outcome
N contente5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
100-100-100e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“NPK content in both maize and kale tissues, was significant between the amendments and control. Capsicum tissues had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher N content both in SRF and CF higher application rates of 125-159-45 & 100-100-100, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At final harvest, soil planted with maize and amended with the highest slow release fertilizer rate had significantly higher P content than lower rates and the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Organ / stage
soil samplese6
Treatment
the highest SRF ratee6
Outcome
P contente6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
p ≤ 0.05e6
Comparator
lower rates and the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“At final harvest, soil samples planted with maize and amended with the highest SRF rate showed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher P content, compared to lower rates and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agronomic optimal rate of the slow release fertilizer, determined by a quadratic function, was higher than that of commercial fertilizer.

Treatment
SRFe7
Outcome
agronomic optimal ratee7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
determined by quadratic functione7
Comparator
CFe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“The agronomic optimal rate of SRF determined by quadratic function were found to be higher than that of CF. SRF was found to enhance growth and yields of crops just like CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The slow release fertilizer enhanced growth and yields of crops just like commercial fertilizer.

Treatment
SRFe7
Outcome
growth and yields of cropse7
Direction
enhancee7
Qualifier
just like CFe7
Comparator
CFe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“The agronomic optimal rate of SRF determined by quadratic function were found to be higher than that of CF. SRF was found to enhance growth and yields of crops just like CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1439 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

163 papers: 152 positive, 11 negative or no effect

151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 90 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 240 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,196 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.