Paper · 2025 · Pest Management Science

Development and characterization of an eco‐friendly plant extract‐loaded nanoemulsion for pest control

Zitao Yang; Liangui Luo; Yufei Ji; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Phyma leptostachya is a traditional insecticidal plant that has been employed as a natural insecticide for the control of various pests. Nanotechnology possesses transformative potential in the field of crop protection and contributes to the optimal utilization and outstanding performance of plant extracts. Hence, the preparation process of P. leptostachya extract‐loaded nanoemulsions was investigated in this study, as well as the aphicidal activity and safety to non‐target organisms. RESULTS Nanoemulsion formulated with the emulsifier EL‐60 demonstrated superior stability. Furthermore, the stability of these nanoemulsions was found to enhance with increasing emulsifier concentrations, ranging from 1% to 5%. The optimized formulation of nanoemulsion was formed as follows: 0.2% P. leptostachya extract, 2% S‐200, 3% EL‐60, and 94.8% deionized water. Finally, P. leptostachya extract‐loaded nanoemulsion showed excellent insecticidal activity against Acyrthosiphon pisum with LC 50 0.2267 mg/mL at 24 h. The LC 50 of nanoemulsion to earthworm was much higher than 10 mg/kg dried soil, indicating nanoemulsion has good safety. In addition, nanoemulsion had no effect on the plant height of Vicia faba and bolster its antioxidant systems. CONCLUSION This research has enabled the design and fabrication of nanoemulsions loaded with P. leptostachya extract, which serve as a novel insecticide aimed at enhancing insecticidal efficacy with low toxicity that is beneficial to the sustainable control of pests. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoemulsion did not affect Vicia faba height.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae0
Treatment
nanoemulsione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoemulsion had no effect on the plant height of Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoemulsion bolstered Vicia faba antioxidant systems.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae0
Treatment
nanoemulsione0
Outcome
antioxidant systemse0
Direction
bolstere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoemulsion had no effect on the plant height of Vicia faba and bolster its antioxidant systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1264 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.