Abstract
This article provides a regional survey of the syntaxa of shrub and tree-shrub vegetation of the class Crataego-Prunetea Tx. 1962 nom. conserv. propos., which represents scrub and mantle vegetation seral or marginal to broad-leaved forests in the nemoral zone and the submediterranean regions of Europe. Until recently, the study of this vegetation in Russia was very fragmentary, and data on the diversity of shrub communities in the country were practically not used in the European Checklist (Mucina et al., 2016). Some problematic issues in the study of the ecology and geography of shrub vegetation, in particular, their differentiation from shrub steppes, successional status, according to the authors, require detailed study. The data for the review was the database including 130 relevés done by the authors in 2005–2023 in the Southwest of Russia (Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Kursk, Lipetsk, Oryol, Rostov, and Tula Regions). 103 relevés are presented for the first time; although 38 of these were previously published, but after comparative analysis, their syntaxonomic position was changed. For higher units of shrub vegetation, regional diagnostic combinations are established, which included species with constancy of more than 20 % and statistical φ-coefficient of accuracy values more than 20 (p < 0.05). Based on the analysis, the following regional diagnostic combination was identified for the class Crataego-Prunetea: Agrimonia eupatoria s. l., Fragaria viridis, Phlomoides tuberosa, Poa angustifolia, Prunus fruticosa, P. spinosa s. l., P. tenella, Rhamnus cathartica, Rosa canina aggr. Its peculiarity is the absence of shrub species of genera Crataegus, Rubus and Rosa (with the exception of R. canina aggr.), which are traditionally diagnostic for the class in the Central and Southern Europe communities (Mucina et al., 2016). Attention is also drawn to the revealed fidelity of species of meadow steppes, steppe forest edges and meadows to this group of relevés: Agrimonia eupatoria s. l., Fragaria viridis, Phlomoides tuberosa, Poa angustifolia, which corresponds to the pattern of communities on the “forest–steppe” gradient in the Southwest of Russia. In the study area, the class is represented by the only order Prunetalia spinosae Tx. 1952, the diagnostic species of which are accepted within the scope of the class, and 3 alliances in its composition: Berberidion vulgaris Br.-Bl. ex Tx. 1952 nom. conserv. propos., Acerion tatarici Fitsailo 2007 nom. dub. propos., Prunion fruticosae Tx. 1952. It is recommended to change the verbal diagnosis of the alliance Berberidion vulgaris, which, according to as our study shows, unites thermophylous shrub and tree-shrub communities of the temperate and sub-Mediterranean parts of not only Southern and Central, but also Eastern Europe. Regional combination of diagnostic species of the alliance are Agrimonia eupatoria, Campanula rapunculoides, Prunus spinosa s. l., Rhamnus cathartica. The alliance Acerion tatarici unites tree-shrub thermophylous communities with the presence and dominance of Acer tataricum on the slopes of ravines and river valleys, edges of broad-leaved forests and outskirts of steppe areas in the forest-steppe and steppe zones in Eastern Europe. Diagnostic combination of the alliance are Acer tataricum, Alliaria petiolata, Aristolochia clematitis, Euphorbia stepposa, Scutellaria altissima, Ulmus minor. We pre-suggest rejecting the name of the alliance as doubtful (nom. dub. propos.) due to errors in its original establishment. A unit of similar content might be described with the accumulation of geobotanical data. The alliance Prunion fruticosae unites subcontinental and continental shrub communities of the forest-steppe and steppe zones of Central and Eastern Europe. Regional diagnostic combination of the alliance: Adonis vernalis, Chamaecytisus ruthenicus, Coronilla varia, Filipendula vulgaris, Galium verum s. l., Iris aphylla, Phlomoides tuberosa, Prunus fruticosa, Prunus tenella, Salvia nutans, Seseli annuum, Stachys recta, Stipa pennata, Thalictrum minus s. l., Vincetoxicum hirundinaria, Xanthoselinum alsaticum. This combination high constancy of meadow-steppe and steppe herbs reflects significant steppization process. Based on floristic comparison with syntaxa known in Europe, we believe that it is inappropriate to classify communities formed by Prunus spinosa s. l., P. tenella and P. fruticosa in the Southwest of Russia either as widely interpreted syntaxa of Central Europe or as shrub steppes of more easterner regions of Russia. Within the two alliances and one order of the class Crataego-Prunetea, four new associations (Poo angustifoliae–Prunetum spinosae ass. nov., Urtico dioicae–Prunetum spinosae ass. nov., Agrimonio eupatoriae–Prunetum tenellae ass. nov., Phlomoido tuberosae–Prunetum fruticosae ass. nov.) and three subassociations (Poo angustifoliae–Prunetum spinosae typicum subass. nov., P. a.–P. s. galietosum veri subass. nov., P. a.–P. s. festucetosum valesiacae) are established. Some types of shrub communities in the studied area are still known from small relevé set in few sites including phytocoenoses dominated by species common in the communities of the class Crataego-Prunetea, whose position in the syntaxonomic hierarchy is yet not clear. That is the reason of the so far non-rank status of the communities Cornus sanguinea, Rhamnus cathartica, and Lonicera tatarica within this class.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
The survey presents 103 relevés for the first time.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“103 relevés are presented for the first time”
Claim · model-written summary
Comparative analysis changed the syntaxonomic placement of 38 relevés.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“38 of these were previously published, but after comparative analysis, their syntaxonomic position was changed”
Claim · model-written summary
A regional diagnostic combination was identified for Crataego-Prunetea.
Verbatim
e0“the following regional diagnostic combination was identified for the class Crataego-Prunetea: Agrimonia eupatoria s. l., Fragaria viridis, Phlomoides tuberosa, Poa angustifolia, Prunus fruticosa, P. spinosa s. l., P. tenella, Rhamnus cathartica, Rosa canina aggr.”
Claim · model-written summary
The diagnostic combination lacks most traditionally diagnostic Crataegus, Rubus and Rosa shrubs.
Rosa
Crataegus
RubusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the absence of shrub species of genera Crataegus, Rubus and Rosa (with the exception of R. canina aggr.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Meadow-steppe and meadow species showed fidelity to this relevé group.
- Taxon
- Agrimonia eupatoria s. l.
_Agrimonia_eupatoria_inflorescence.jpg?width=60)
Agrimonia eupatoriae0 - Outcome
- fidelity of species of meadow steppes, steppe forest edges and meadowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Agrimonia_eupatoria_inflorescence.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“revealed fidelity of species of meadow steppes, steppe forest edges and meadows to this group of relevés: Agrimonia eupatoria s. l., Fragaria viridis, Phlomoides tuberosa, Poa angustifolia”
Claim · model-written summary
The class includes one order and three alliances in the study area.
Verbatim
e0“the class is represented by the only order Prunetalia spinosae Tx. 1952, the diagnostic species of which are accepted within the scope of the class, and 3 alliances in its composition: Berberidion vulgaris Br.-Bl. ex Tx. 1952 nom. conserv. propos., Acerion tatarici Fitsailo 2007 nom. dub. propos., Prunion fruticosae Tx. 1952.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend revising the diagnosis of Berberidion vulgaris to include Eastern Europe.
Verbatim
e0“It is recommended to change the verbal diagnosis of the alliance Berberidion vulgaris, which, according to as our study shows, unites thermophylous shrub and tree-shrub communities of the temperate and sub-Mediterranean parts of not only Southern and Central, but also Eastern Europe.”
Claim · model-written summary
A regional diagnostic species combination was identified for Berberidion vulgaris.
- Taxon
- Prunus spinosa s. l.
Prunus spinosae0 - Outcome
- Regional combination of diagnostic speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional combination of diagnostic species of the alliance are Agrimonia eupatoria, Campanula rapunculoides, Prunus spinosa s. l., Rhamnus cathartica.”
Claim · model-written summary
Acerion tatarici comprises tree-shrub communities dominated by Acer tataricum in specified habitats.
- Taxon
- Acer tataricum
.jpg?width=60)
Acer tataricume0 - Outcome
- presence and dominancee0
- Setting
- Eastern Europee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The alliance Acerion tatarici unites tree-shrub thermophylous communities with the presence and dominance of Acer tataricum on the slopes of ravines and river valleys, edges of broad-leaved forests and outskirts of steppe areas in the forest-steppe and steppe zones in Eastern Europe.”
Claim · model-written summary
A diagnostic combination was identified for Acerion tatarici.
- Taxon
- Acer tataricumAcer tataricume0
- Outcome
- Diagnostic combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Diagnostic combination of the alliance are Acer tataricum, Alliaria petiolata, Aristolochia clematitis, Euphorbia stepposa, Scutellaria altissima, Ulmus minor.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose rejecting the Acerion tatarici name as doubtful.
- Outcome
- rejecting the name of the alliance as doubtfule0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“We pre-suggest rejecting the name of the alliance as doubtful (nom. dub. propos.) due to errors in its original establishment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Prunion fruticosae groups continental shrub communities in Central and Eastern Europe.
Verbatim
e0“The alliance Prunion fruticosae unites subcontinental and continental shrub communities of the forest-steppe and steppe zones of Central and Eastern Europe.”
Claim · model-written summary
Prunion fruticosae has a regional diagnostic combination of meadow-steppe and steppe species.
- Taxon
- Prunus fruticosa
Prunus fruticosae0 - Outcome
- Regional diagnostic combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional diagnostic combination of the alliance: Adonis vernalis, Chamaecytisus ruthenicus, Coronilla varia, Filipendula vulgaris, Galium verum s. l., Iris aphylla, Phlomoides tuberosa, Prunus fruticosa, Prunus tenella, Salvia nutans, Seseli annuum, Stachys recta, Stipa pennata, Thalictrum minus s. l., Vincetoxicum hirundinaria, Xanthoselinum alsaticum.”
Claim · model-written summary
The species combination was interpreted as evidence of substantial steppization.
Verbatim
e0“This combination high constancy of meadow-steppe and steppe herbs reflects significant steppization process.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors reject placing Southwest Russian Prunus communities in broad Central European or eastern Russian shrub-steppe syntaxa.
- Taxon
- Prunus spinosa s. l.Prunus spinosae0
- Outcome
- inappropriate to classify communitiese0
- Setting
- Southwest of Russiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it is inappropriate to classify communities formed by Prunus spinosa s. l., P. tenella and P. fruticosa in the Southwest of Russia either as widely interpreted syntaxa of Central Europe or as shrub steppes of more easterner regions of Russia.”
Claim · model-written summary
Four new associations were established.
Verbatim
e0“four new associations (Poo angustifoliae–Prunetum spinosae ass. nov., Urtico dioicae–Prunetum spinosae ass. nov., Agrimonio eupatoriae–Prunetum tenellae ass. nov., Phlomoido tuberosae–Prunetum fruticosae ass. nov.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Three new subassociations were established.
Verbatim
e0“three subassociations (Poo angustifoliae–Prunetum spinosae typicum subass. nov., P. a.–P. s. galietosum veri subass. nov., P. a.–P. s. festucetosum valesiacae)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cornus, Rhamnus and Lonicera communities retain non-rank status because their positions remain unclear.
- Taxon
- Cornus sanguinea
Cornus sanguineae0 - Outcome
- non-rank statuse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“non-rank status of the communities Cornus sanguinea, Rhamnus cathartica, and Lonicera tatarica within this class”