Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Fulvic Acid and Potassium Application to Mitigate Drought Effects on Sweet Potato

Ehab A. Ibrahim; Hamada M. B. El-Metwaly

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study uniquely explores the synergistic effects of a combined fulvic acid and potassium application on sweet potato under water stress, shedding new light beyond individual applications. Two field experiments were conducted during the summer seasons of 2023 and 2024, using the sweet potato cultivar Aibs. Six treatments were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. These included the following: (1) 14-day irrigation interval with 120 kg ha −1 K, (2) 21-day irrigation interval with 120 kg ha −1 K, (3) 21-day irrigation interval with 120 kg ha −1 K and 12.4 kg ha −1 of fulvic acid, (4) 21-day irrigation interval with 120 kg ha −1 K and 24.7 kg ha −1 of fulvic acid, (5) 21-day irrigation interval with 90 kg ha −1 K and 12.4 kg ha −1 of fulvic acid, and (6) 21-day irrigation interval with 90 kg ha −1 K and 24.7 kg ha −1 of fulvic acid. The findings reveal that water deficit conditions significantly reduce growth parameters, yield (19.6 and 19%), leaf chlorophyll (12.6 and 13.9%), and total applied irrigation water per hectare (24.3 and 21%). However, they increase the contents of leaf proline (65.5 and 63.2%), tuber root dry matter (46.2 and 48.5%), and total soluble solids (22.8 and 24.4%), as well as water use efficiency (6 and 2.5%), in both seasons, respectively. The fulvic acid application significantly mitigated these effects, particularly at a higher rate alongside adequate potassium (120 kg ha −1 K). This mitigation is likely attributable to improved nutrient water uptake and osmotic adjustment. These findings highlight the potential of fulvic acid combined with an adequate potassium level for improving crop performance under drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered sweet potato yield by 19.6 and 19% in successive seasons.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
yielde0e1e2e3
Direction
reducee0e1e2e3
Value
19.6 and 19%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit conditions significantly reduce growth parameters, yield (19.6 and 19%), leaf chlorophyll (12.6 and 13.9%), and total applied irrigation water per hectare (24.3 and 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered leaf chlorophyll by 12.6 and 13.9%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
leaf chlorophylle0e1e2e3
Direction
reducee0e1e2e3
Value
12.6 and 13.9%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit conditions significantly reduce growth parameters, yield (19.6 and 19%), leaf chlorophyll (12.6 and 13.9%), and total applied irrigation water per hectare (24.3 and 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered irrigation water applied by 24.3 and 21%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
total applied irrigation water per hectaree0e1e2e3
Direction
reducee0e1e2e3
Value
24.3 and 21%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit conditions significantly reduce growth parameters, yield (19.6 and 19%), leaf chlorophyll (12.6 and 13.9%), and total applied irrigation water per hectare (24.3 and 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered sweet potato growth parameters.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
growth parameterse0e1e2e3
Direction
reducee0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit conditions significantly reduce growth parameters, yield (19.6 and 19%), leaf chlorophyll (12.6 and 13.9%), and total applied irrigation water per hectare (24.3 and 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit raised leaf proline by 65.5 and 63.2%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
leaf prolinee0e1e2e3
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3
Value
65.5 and 63.2%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increase the contents of leaf proline (65.5 and 63.2%), tuber root dry matter (46.2 and 48.5%), and total soluble solids (22.8 and 24.4%), as well as water use efficiency (6 and 2.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit raised tuber dry matter by 46.2 and 48.5%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
tuber root dry mattere0e1e2e3
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3
Value
46.2 and 48.5%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increase the contents of leaf proline (65.5 and 63.2%), tuber root dry matter (46.2 and 48.5%), and total soluble solids (22.8 and 24.4%), as well as water use efficiency (6 and 2.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit raised soluble solids by 22.8 and 24.4%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
total soluble solidse0e1e2e3
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3
Value
22.8 and 24.4%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increase the contents of leaf proline (65.5 and 63.2%), tuber root dry matter (46.2 and 48.5%), and total soluble solids (22.8 and 24.4%), as well as water use efficiency (6 and 2.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit raised water-use efficiency by 6 and 2.5%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3
Outcome
water use efficiencye0e1e2e3
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3
Value
6 and 2.5%e0e1e2e3
Comparator
14-day irrigation intervale0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increase the contents of leaf proline (65.5 and 63.2%), tuber root dry matter (46.2 and 48.5%), and total soluble solids (22.8 and 24.4%), as well as water use efficiency (6 and 2.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid, especially with 120 kg per hectare potassium, mitigated water-deficit effects.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0e1e2e3
Treatment
fulvic acid applicatione0e1e2e3
Outcome
these effectse0e1e2e3
Direction
mitigatede0e1e2e3
Comparator
water deficit conditionse0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fulvic acid application significantly mitigated these effects, particularly at a higher rate alongside adequate potassium (120 kg ha −1 K)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato cultivar Aibs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“14-day irrigation interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–934 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.