Abstract
In terms of solid waste management, chicken waste manure appears to be a promising, innovative, sustainable waste treatment technology. Gallus gallus domesticus intestinal waste is broken down and converted into fertilizer or chicken manure over a period of 90 to 100 days. Globally, sustainable agricultural methods have been employed to reduce the adverse effects of synthetic fertilizers, which decrease soil fertility and organic matter. An annual herb, Vigna radiata is a member of the legume family. When fully matured, its seeds provide a valuable source of 85% digestible protein for human use. The high protein content and excellent amino acid, mineral, and vitamin profile of Vigna aconitifolia make it a popular choice for food and fodder. In addition to comparing the effects of synthetic fertilizer and chicken manure on soil fertility, the study aimed to examine the growth parameters of Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia roots, leaves, plant height, pods, and seeds. In comparison to synthetic fertilizer, all treated groups who received a high dose of chicken waste manure after 120 days of the study showed significant increases in the number of nodes, leaves, roots, shoot length, number of pods, and number of seeds. The treatment groups that received a high dose of chicken waste manure during the 90-day pilot trial indicated significantly higher levels of organic carbon, NPK, and pH compared to those that received synthetic fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
High-dose chicken manure increased nodes, leaves and roots in both Vigna species after 120 days relative to synthetic fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- high dose of chicken waste manuree1
- Outcome
- number of nodes, leaves, rootse1
- Direction
- increasese1
- Qualifier
- after 120 dayse1
- Comparator
- synthetic fertilizere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia”
e1“In comparison to synthetic fertilizer, all treated groups who received a high dose of chicken waste manure after 120 days of the study showed significant increases in the number of nodes, leaves, roots, shoot length, number of pods, and number of seeds.”
Claim · model-written summary
High-dose chicken manure increased shoot length in both Vigna species after 120 days.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifoliaVigna aconitifoliaVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- high dose of chicken waste manuree1
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe1
- Direction
- increasese1
- Comparator
- synthetic fertilizere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia”
e1“In comparison to synthetic fertilizer, all treated groups who received a high dose of chicken waste manure after 120 days of the study showed significant increases in the number of nodes, leaves, roots, shoot length, number of pods, and number of seeds.”
Claim · model-written summary
High-dose chicken manure increased pod and seed counts in both Vigna species after 120 days.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifoliaVigna aconitifoliaVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- high dose of chicken waste manuree1
- Outcome
- number of pods, and number of seedse1
- Direction
- increasese1
- Comparator
- synthetic fertilizere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia”
e1“In comparison to synthetic fertilizer, all treated groups who received a high dose of chicken waste manure after 120 days of the study showed significant increases in the number of nodes, leaves, roots, shoot length, number of pods, and number of seeds.”
Claim · model-written summary
High-dose chicken manure produced higher soil organic carbon, NPK and pH than synthetic fertilizer in the pilot trial.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifoliaVigna aconitifoliaVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- high dose of chicken waste manuree1
- Outcome
- levels of organic carbon, NPK, and pHe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- 90-day pilot triale1
- Comparator
- synthetic fertilizere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vigna radiata and Vigna aconitifolia”
e1“The treatment groups that received a high dose of chicken waste manure during the 90-day pilot trial indicated significantly higher levels of organic carbon, NPK, and pH compared to those that received synthetic fertilizer.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.