Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Comparing the effect of organic manure, biofertilizer and synthetic fertilizer on production and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop

Abhilash Thakur; Mohd Shah Alam

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2023-24 at the Research Farm of Abhilashi University, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, to comparing the effect of organic manure, biofertilizer and synthetic fertilizer on production and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop. The study included eight treatments comprising different combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), vermicompost and Azotobacter, arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. Among the treatments, T₄ (100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter) recorded the highest plant height, spike length, grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹) and biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹) while the control (T₁) recorded the lowest values. Although the highest harvest index was observed in T₁ (42.71%), integrated nutrient treatments showed significantly improved productivity due to enhanced nutrient uptake, better microbial activity and improved soil health. The study makes clear that INM enhances barley yield potential and fosters sustainable practices in temperate hilly agricultural systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₄ with 100% RDF, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave the highest plant height and spike length in barley.

Treatment
100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobactere0
Outcome
plant height, spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“T₄ (100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter) recorded the highest plant height, spike length, grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹) and biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the control (T₁) recorded the lowest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₄ with 100% RDF, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave the highest barley grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobactere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.75 q ha⁻¹e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“T₄ (100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter) recorded the highest plant height, spike length, grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹) and biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the control (T₁) recorded the lowest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₄ with 100% RDF, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave the highest barley straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobactere0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
67.29 q ha⁻¹e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“T₄ (100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter) recorded the highest plant height, spike length, grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹) and biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the control (T₁) recorded the lowest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₄ with 100% RDF, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave the highest barley biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobactere0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
113.04 q ha⁻¹e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“T₄ (100% RDF + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter) recorded the highest plant height, spike length, grain yield (45.75 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (67.29 q ha⁻¹) and biological yield (113.04 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the control (T₁) recorded the lowest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control (T₁) had the highest barley harvest index (42.71%).

Outcome
harvest indexe2
Value
42.71%e2
Qualifier
observed in T₁e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although the highest harvest index was observed in T₁ (42.71%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient treatments significantly improved barley productivity.

Treatment
integrated nutrient treatmentse3
Outcome
productivitye3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“integrated nutrient treatments showed significantly improved productivity due to enhanced nutrient uptake, better microbial activity and improved soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–970 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the barley productivity gain to enhanced nutrient uptake, better microbial activity and improved soil health.

Outcome
productivitye3
Qualifier
enhanced nutrient uptake, better microbial activity and improved soil healthe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“integrated nutrient treatments showed significantly improved productivity due to enhanced nutrient uptake, better microbial activity and improved soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–970 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.