Paper · 2025 · Starch - Stärke

A Sustainable Approach to Turning Mango Kernel Waste Starch Into Edible Coating With Lemongrass Essential Oils for Shelf‐Life Extension of Guava Fruits

Ajay Yadav; Nishant Kumar; Ashutosh Upadhyay; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored the application of mango kernel seed (MKS) starch as a coating base with lemon grass essential (LEO) oil to improve the postharvest quality of guava fruit. Guava fruits were subjected to low temperature of 10°C, 85%–90% RH. Various physiochemical parameters, such as titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSS), and ascorbic acid (AA) quality parameters, including firmness, physiological loss in weight (PLW), color, and microbial growth, were evaluated during the storage period. The analysis of results revealed that coated samples effectively preserved the PLW, AA content, and firmness, with values of 3.89%, 201.45 mg/100 g, and 6.45 N, respectively, compared to 10.56%, 176.02 mg/100 g, and 3.48 N in the control samples after 12 days of storage. Furthermore, the coated guava retained 80.86% and 82.66% of its total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, respectively, in contrast to the control samples, which retained 61.11% and 64.24%, respectively, after 12 days of storage. In addition, the respiratory peak of (122.45 mL CO 2 /kg/h) was observed in control sample after nineth day of storage, whereas in respiratory peak (21.34 mL CO 2 /kg/h) was observed in edible coated sample after 21 days of storage. The addition of lemongrass essential oil to the coating matrix inhibited yeast and mold growth on the fruit surface. The research findings demonstrated that MKS, a by‐product of the mango‐processing industry, can be effectively utilized as a coating material to extend the shelf life of guava fruit to 21 days, compared to a control sample with a shelf life of 9 days during low‐temperature storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated guava preserved PLW after 12 days versus control.

Treatment
coated samplese0
Outcome
PLWe0
Direction
preservede0
Value
3.89%e0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of results revealed that coated samples effectively preserved the PLW, AA content, and firmness, with values of 3.89%, 201.45 mg/100 g, and 6.45 N, respectively, compared to 10.56%, 176.02 mg/100 g, and 3.48 N in the control samples after 12 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated guava preserved AA content after 12 days versus control.

Treatment
coated samplese0
Outcome
AA contente0
Direction
preservede0
Value
201.45 mg/100 ge0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of results revealed that coated samples effectively preserved the PLW, AA content, and firmness, with values of 3.89%, 201.45 mg/100 g, and 6.45 N, respectively, compared to 10.56%, 176.02 mg/100 g, and 3.48 N in the control samples after 12 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated guava preserved firmness after 12 days versus control.

Treatment
coated samplese0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
preservede0
Value
6.45 Ne0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storagee0
Comparator
control samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of results revealed that coated samples effectively preserved the PLW, AA content, and firmness, with values of 3.89%, 201.45 mg/100 g, and 6.45 N, respectively, compared to 10.56%, 176.02 mg/100 g, and 3.48 N in the control samples after 12 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated guava retained more total phenolic content after 12 days than controls.

Treatment
coated guavae0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
retainede0
Value
80.86%e0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the coated guava retained 80.86% and 82.66% of its total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, respectively, in contrast to the control samples, which retained 61.11% and 64.24%, respectively, after 12 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated guava retained more antioxidant activity after 12 days than controls.

Treatment
coated guavae0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
retainede0
Value
82.66%e0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the coated guava retained 80.86% and 82.66% of its total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, respectively, in contrast to the control samples, which retained 61.11% and 64.24%, respectively, after 12 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coated sample had a respiratory peak of 21.34 mL CO 2 /kg/h after 21 days versus 122.45 after nine days in control.

Treatment
edible coated samplee0
Outcome
respiratory peake0
Value
21.34 mL CO 2 /kg/he0
Comparator
control samplee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, the respiratory peak of (122.45 mL CO 2 /kg/h) was observed in control sample after nineth day of storage, whereas in respiratory peak (21.34 mL CO 2 /kg/h) was observed in edible coated sample after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemongrass essential oil in the coating inhibited yeast and mold growth.

Treatment
lemongrass essential oile0
Interactor
yeast and molde0other
Outcome
yeast and mold growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of lemongrass essential oil to the coating matrix inhibited yeast and mold growth on the fruit surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MKS coating extended guava shelf life to 21 days versus nine days for control.

Treatment
MKSe0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
extende0
Value
21 dayse0
Comparator
control samplee0
Setting
low‐temperature storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MKS, a by‐product of the mango‐processing industry, can be effectively utilized as a coating material to extend the shelf life of guava fruit to 21 days, compared to a control sample with a shelf life of 9 days during low‐temperature storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1660 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.