Paper · 2025 · Foods

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Enhance Grain Yield and Nutritional Quality in Rice via Improved Photosynthesis and Zinc Bioavailability

Jie Chen; Muyan Zhang; Jingtong Sun; et al.

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Improving rice yield, eating quality, and zinc (Zn) nutrition is crucial to meet the growing demand for high-quality and nutritious food, while zinc itself plays a pivotal role in rice growth and quality formation. In this two-year field study, we investigated the effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) one-time foliar application at 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 during the gestation stage on grain yield, rice quality, and zinc biofortification. Although some year-to-year variations and year × treatment interaction in the magnitude of these effects were observed, the positive responses to ZnO NPs were consistent across the two years. Results showed that ZnO NPs application increased grain yield by 1.40–4.62%, mainly supported by enhanced net photosynthetic rate and SPAD values after heading. Meanwhile, ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value (1.61–7.22%) and breakdown value (5.36–15.63%), while reducing chalkiness rate (5.73–18.62%), chalkiness degree (11.57–27.18%), amylose content (3.72–6.76%), and setback value (8.98–24.53%). Additionally, ZnO NPs markedly increased the zinc content (23.73–85.10% in brown rice; 29.07–103.07% in polished rice) and reduced the phytic acid to zinc molar ratio by 18.46–48.39%, improving zinc enrichment and bioavailability. These findings suggest that ZnO NPs foliar application is effective to simultaneously enhance grain productivity, rice quality, and zinc density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs increased rice grain yield by 1.40–4.62%.

Treatment
ZnO NPs applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.40–4.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs application increased grain yield by 1.40–4.62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs enhanced net photosynthetic rate and SPAD after heading.

Treatment
ZnO NPs applicatione1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate and SPAD valuese0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
after headinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“mainly supported by enhanced net photosynthetic rate and SPAD values after heading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs application increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs enhanced rice taste value by 1.61–7.22%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
taste valuee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
1.61–7.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value (1.61–7.22%) and breakdown value (5.36–15.63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs enhanced rice breakdown value by 5.36–15.63%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
breakdown valuee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
5.36–15.63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value (1.61–7.22%) and breakdown value (5.36–15.63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced rice chalkiness rate by 5.73–18.62%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse1
Outcome
chalkiness ratee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
5.73–18.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“while reducing chalkiness rate (5.73–18.62%), chalkiness degree (11.57–27.18%), amylose content (3.72–6.76%), and setback value (8.98–24.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced rice chalkiness degree by 11.57–27.18%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse1
Outcome
chalkiness degreee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
11.57–27.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“while reducing chalkiness rate (5.73–18.62%), chalkiness degree (11.57–27.18%), amylose content (3.72–6.76%), and setback value (8.98–24.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced rice amylose content by 3.72–6.76%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse1
Outcome
amylose contente0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
3.72–6.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“while reducing chalkiness rate (5.73–18.62%), chalkiness degree (11.57–27.18%), amylose content (3.72–6.76%), and setback value (8.98–24.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced rice setback value by 8.98–24.53%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse1
Outcome
setback valuee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
8.98–24.53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“while reducing chalkiness rate (5.73–18.62%), chalkiness degree (11.57–27.18%), amylose content (3.72–6.76%), and setback value (8.98–24.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnO NPs significantly enhanced taste value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs increased zinc content in brown rice by 23.73–85.10%.

Organ / stage
brown ricee0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.73–85.10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs markedly increased the zinc content (23.73–85.10% in brown rice; 29.07–103.07% in polished rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs increased zinc content in polished rice by 29.07–103.07%.

Organ / stage
polished ricee0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.07–103.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs markedly increased the zinc content (23.73–85.10% in brown rice; 29.07–103.07% in polished rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced the phytic acid to zinc molar ratio by 18.46–48.39%.

Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
phytic acid to zinc molar ratioe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.46–48.39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs markedly increased the zinc content (23.73–85.10% in brown rice; 29.07–103.07% in polished rice) and reduced the phytic acid to zinc molar ratio by 18.46–48.39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1227 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

zinc oxide · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc oxide · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 76 positive, 4 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.