Paper · 2025 · Restoration Ecology

The role of competition in moderating plant–soil feedback for restoring ecosystems invaded by Brazilian peppertree ( Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi)

Megann M. Harlow; Nathan E. Harms; Aaron N. Schad; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Ecosystem restoration requires the management of invasive plants due to the harmful effects they have on both above‐ and belowground ecosystem processes. Belowground soil modifications by invasive plants, particularly those driven by plant–soil feedbacks (PSFs), are thought to significantly influence an invader's success by creating soil conditions that affect native and invasive plant performance. Brazilian peppertree ( Schinus terebinthifolia ) is an invasive tree suspected to negatively influence plant communities through PSFs. Objectives This study examined the impact of S. terebinthifolia and its associated soil microbial community on the efficacy of restoration efforts. Methods We conducted a controlled greenhouse competition experiment between the invader and native south Texas grasses, using soil inoculum from invaded and uninvaded sites. Results Schinus terebinthifolia ‐invaded soils consistently exerted a negative PSF on native grasses, reducing their height by 10% and biomass by 24%. Similarly, S. terebinthifolia ‐invaded soils reduced its own biomass by 15% when grown alone. However, the negative direct PSF was neutralized when in competition with native grasses, resulting in a net‐positive PSF for S. terebinthifolia driven by negative interspecific feedbacks. While many studies report that positive PSFs promote invader success, our results demonstrate that negative feedbacks can also facilitate invasion by disproportionately suppressing natives. Notably, native competition lowered S. terebinthifolia biomass by 52%. This, along with improved native grass performance in uninvaded, competition‐free soils, highlights the importance of revegetation in restoration efforts. Conclusions Restoration planning, implementation, and monitoring should account for species‐specific PSFs, soil legacies, and native revegetation competition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil conditioned by invaded soil reduced the height of native grasses by 10%.

Taxon
native grassese1
Treatment
invaded soilse1
Interactor
Schinus terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliae1weed
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
10%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · InteractorCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Schinus terebinthifolia ‐invaded soils consistently exerted a negative PSF on native grasses, reducing their height by 10% and biomass by 24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil conditioned by invaded soil reduced the biomass of native grasses by 24%.

Taxon
native grassese1
Treatment
invaded soilse1
Interactor
Schinus terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliae1weed
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
24%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · InteractorCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Schinus terebinthifolia ‐invaded soils consistently exerted a negative PSF on native grasses, reducing their height by 10% and biomass by 24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Invaded soil reduced the biomass of Schinus terebinthifolia by 15% when it was grown alone.

Taxon
S. terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliae2
Treatment
invaded soilse2
Outcome
its own biomasse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
15%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Similarly, S. terebinthifolia ‐invaded soils reduced its own biomass by 15% when grown alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant-soil feedback for Schinus terebinthifolia became net-positive in competition with native grasses, driven by negative interspecific feedbacks.

Taxon
S. terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliae3
Treatment
competition with native grassese3
Outcome
PSF for S. terebinthifoliae3
Direction
net‐positivee3
Qualifier
driven by negative interspecific feedbackse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the negative direct PSF was neutralized when in competition with native grasses, resulting in a net‐positive PSF for S. terebinthifolia driven by negative interspecific feedbacks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native competition lowered the biomass of Schinus terebinthifolia by 52%.

Taxon
S. terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliae4
Treatment
native competitione4
Outcome
biomasse4
Direction
lowerede4
Value
52%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Notably, native competition lowered S. terebinthifolia biomass by 52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native grass performance improved in uninvaded, competition-free soils.

Taxon
native grasse5
Treatment
uninvaded, competition‐free soilse5
Outcome
native grass performancee5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“improved native grass performance in uninvaded, competition‐free soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1663 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Restoration planning should account for species-specific plant-soil feedbacks, soil legacies and native revegetation competition.

Taxon
Schinus terebinthifoliaSchinus terebinthifoliat0
Outcome
account for species‐specific PSFs, soil legacies, and native revegetation competitione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schinus terebinthifolia
Schinus terebinthifolia · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brazilian peppertree ( Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–147 · show in text ↑
e6

“Restoration planning, implementation, and monitoring should account for species‐specific PSFs, soil legacies, and native revegetation competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1888 · show in text ↑