Paper · 2024 · 2024 International Conference on Optimization Computing and Wireless Communication (ICOCWC)

Retraction Notice: Discovering Patterns with Neural Networks in Agricultural Crop Monitoring

Akhilendra Pratap Singh; Neeraj Kaushik; Rahul Pawar

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

neural networks have emerged as practical tools for discovering styles in agricultural crop monitoring. The motive of this take a look at was to research whether or not neural network strategies will be implemented to seize and perceive patterns in various parameters related to crop monitoring. Data was accrued from four corn fields inside the Midwest US from October 2007 to October 2009. Linear and non-linear neural networks were used to analyze the information, to identify enormous styles associated with crop manufacturing. Effects showed that the neural networks have been able to as they should be perceived styles inside the records, with the non-linear network generating satisfactory results. The results confirmed that the most important parameters related to crop production were the width of the kernel, duration of the cob, and precise leaf location. These findings advocate that neural networks may be a promising technique for understanding complicated crop monitoring relationships.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most important parameters related to corn crop production were kernel width, cob duration and precise leaf location.

Outcome
most important parameters related to crop productione1
Qualifier
width of the kernel, duration of the cob, and precise leaf locatione1
Setting
Midwest USe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data was accrued from four corn fields inside the Midwest US”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results confirmed that the most important parameters related to crop production were the width of the kernel, duration of the cob, and precise leaf location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–866 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-linear neural network gave satisfactory results compared with linear neural networks on corn monitoring data.

Outcome
satisfactory resultse2
Comparator
Lineare3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data was accrued from four corn fields inside the Midwest US”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–356 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the non-linear network generating satisfactory results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–704 · show in text ↑
e3

“Linear and non-linear neural networks were used to analyze the information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–466 · show in text ↑