Paper · 2025 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Determination of optimal mixing ratio of organic fertilizer and biochar derived from agricultural waste to increase crop growth and soil carbon sequestration

Sin-Sil Kim; Yu-Na Lee; Dong Won Lee; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) can be accumulated through various organic inputs such as organic fertilizers, compost, and biochar.While organic fertilizers are effective in supplying nutrients, they have limitations in stable carbon sequestration compared to biochar.Therefore, this study aimed to determine the optimal mixing ratio of organic fertilizer and biochar that can supply nutrients while ensuring sustained and stable carbon sequestration.The growth of lettuce, soil chemical properties, and soil carbon sequestration were evaluated through a pot experiment based on the mixing ratios of organic fertilizer and biochar derived from agricultural waste.The treatments in the pot experiment included no fertilizer (NF), inorganic fertilizer (IF), and biochar mixed organic fertilizer (BAOF), mixing ratios of organic fertilizer:biochar = 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30.The results showed that leaf length and width of lettuce increased by 1.70 -1.84 and 1.58 -1.78 times, respectively, in BAOF treatments compared to NF.The highest yield was observed in BAOF (100:0).The organic matter content increased with higher mixing ratio of biochar.SOC stock was observed in the following order: 11.93 (BAOF70:30) > 11.22 (BAOF80:20) > 10.35 (BAOF90:10) > 10.26 (BAOF100:0) t C ha -1 .In conclusion, mixing biochar with organic fertilizers promoted lettuce growth and led to increased soil carbon sequestration.These results indicated that the optimal mixing ratio was determined to be BAOF70:30.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce leaf length increased by 1.70-1.84 times in biochar-mixed organic fertilizer treatments compared with no fertilizer.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
BAOF treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.70 -1.84e0
Comparator
NFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf length and width of lettuce increased by 1.70 -1.84 and 1.58 -1.78 times, respectively, in BAOF treatments compared to NF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce leaf width increased by 1.58-1.78 times in biochar-mixed organic fertilizer treatments compared with no fertilizer.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
BAOF treatmentse0
Outcome
widthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.58 -1.78e0
Comparator
NFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf length and width of lettuce increased by 1.70 -1.84 and 1.58 -1.78 times, respectively, in BAOF treatments compared to NF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest lettuce yield was observed with the 100:0 biochar-mixed organic fertilizer treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
BAOF (100:0)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The growth of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–467 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield was observed in BAOF (100:0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter content increased with a higher biochar mixing ratio.

Treatment
higher mixing ratio of biochare0
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The organic matter content increased with higher mixing ratio of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC stock was highest at BAOF70:30 and declined through 80:20, 90:10 and 100:0.

Outcome
SOC stocke0
Value
11.93 (BAOF70:30) > 11.22 (BAOF80:20) > 10.35 (BAOF90:10) > 10.26 (BAOF100:0) t C ha -1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SOC stock was observed in the following order: 11.93 (BAOF70:30) > 11.22 (BAOF80:20) > 10.35 (BAOF90:10) > 10.26 (BAOF100:0) t C ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1274 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors determine the optimal organic fertilizer:biochar mixing ratio to be BAOF70:30.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Outcome
optimal mixing ratioe0
Value
BAOF70:30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The growth of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–467 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimal mixing ratio was determined to be BAOF70:30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1486 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

52 papers: 41 positive, 11 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

248 papers: 202 positive, 46 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

244 papers more in this group

See all 248 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

biochar · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.