Paper · 2025 · PeerJ

Effects of seed priming with salicylic acid on cuticular wax deposition in sweet sorghum under drought stress

Luhua Yao; Yitao Wu

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background Seed priming is an affordable and effective method to enhance crop drought tolerance by improving seed germination and seedling vigor. However, whether seed priming alters cuticle formation, which could contribute to drought resistance in seedlings, remains unclear. Materials and Methods In this study, sweet sorghum seeds belonging to three varieties were primed with salicylic acid (SA) and the seedlings were exposed to drought stress. The seeds were primed with SA with concentrations of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 mg L −1 . For drought treatment (35% field capacity, 80% of field capacity as the normal condition), both SA-primed and non-primed seeds were planted in a soil mixture. Results Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%). Additionally, leaf water loss rate and chlorophyll leaching rate were significantly reduced. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive associations ( r = 0.79–0.86, P < 0.001) between total wax content and water status as well as proline content. Furthermore, under both well-watered and drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased leaf wax content and biomass in all sorghum varieties. Conclusion Seed priming with salicylic acid at 150 mg L −1 not only promotes normal growth under well-watered conditions, but also enhances sorghum’s adaptability to drought stress, ultimately contributing to drought tolerance without penalizing growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased total wax content by 12.3%–33.3% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
total wax contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.3%–33.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased primary alcohol content by 42.0%–57.0% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
primary alcohol contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.0%–57.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased proline content by 70.9%–119% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70.9%–119%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased leaf water content by 9.8%–36.6% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.8%–36.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased water use efficiency by 28.4%–120% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.4%–120%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased biomass by 25%–30% under drought.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%–30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content (12.3%–33.3%), primary alcohol content (42.0%–57.0%), proline content (70.9%–119%), leaf water content (9.8%–36.6%), water use efficiency (28.4%–120%), and biomass (25%–30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming reduced leaf water loss and chlorophyll leaching rates.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e1
Outcome
leaf water loss rate and chlorophyll leaching ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Additionally, leaf water loss rate and chlorophyll leaching rate were significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased total wax content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–797 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total wax content correlated positively with water status.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Outcome
water statuse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.79–0.86e0
Comparator
total wax contente0

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“strong positive associations ( r = 0.79–0.86, P < 0.001) between total wax content and water status as well as proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1222 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total wax content correlated positively with proline content.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.79–0.86e0
Comparator
total wax contente0

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“strong positive associations ( r = 0.79–0.86, P < 0.001) between total wax content and water status as well as proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased leaf wax content across varieties in watered and drought conditions.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
leaf wax contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“under both well-watered and drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased leaf wax content and biomass in all sorghum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming increased biomass across varieties in watered and drought conditions.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
SA priming at 150 mg L −1e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“under both well-watered and drought conditions, SA priming at 150 mg L −1 significantly increased leaf wax content and biomass in all sorghum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1388 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · SorghumResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: osmolytes · SorghumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

seed treatment · molecular: metabolites · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.