Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Inorganic fertilization and inoculation of Pseudomonas tolaasii on growth, yield and fruit quality of cucumber in hydroponic system with inert substrate

José Manuel Gutiérrez-Campos; María de las Nieves Rodríguez-Mendoza; Juan José Almaraz-Suárez; et al.

17
claims
41
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sustainable alternative to reduce fertilizer use and/or increase crop yields is the inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in hydroponic systems with inert substrate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation, in combination with different fertilization levels, on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of cucumber grown hydroponically in an inert substrate. During the seedling stage, treatments consisted of the application with or without P. tolaasii inoculation, using a completely randomized design (CRD). In the production stage, a CRD with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was used, combining two nutrient solution concentrations (50% or 75%) with PGPR inoculation (with or without P. tolaasii). Photosynthetic rate (12.24%), stem diameter (7.69%), and root volume (13.43%) increased due to inoculation during the seedling phase. In the production phase, inoculation enhanced the number of leaves (6%), root system development (15.7–27.4%), and yield (15%). Meanwhile, the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%). Regarding fruit quality, bacterial inoculation increased total soluble solids (9.23%), and the 75% Steiner solution improved polar diameter (5.2%), total soluble solids (12.3%), and fruit dry biomass (25.53%) compared to the lower concentration. No statistically significant interactions were observed between the evaluated factors; however, when applied together, positive additive effects were evident. Therefore, both P. tolaasii inoculation and the use of the Steiner nutrient solution, either individually or in combination, are beneficial strategies to improve growth, productivity, and fruit quality of cucumber under hydroponic conditions with inert substrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased seedling photosynthetic rate by 12.24%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate (12.24%), stem diameter (7.69%), and root volume (13.43%) increased due to inoculation during the seedling phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased seedling stem diameter by 7.69%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate (12.24%), stem diameter (7.69%), and root volume (13.43%) increased due to inoculation during the seedling phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased seedling root volume by 13.43%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate (12.24%), stem diameter (7.69%), and root volume (13.43%) increased due to inoculation during the seedling phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased production-phase leaf number by 6%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation enhanced the number of leaves (6%), root system development (15.7–27.4%), and yield (15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced root system development by 15.7–27.4%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
root system developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
15.7–27.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation enhanced the number of leaves (6%), root system development (15.7–27.4%), and yield (15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced yield by 15%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation enhanced the number of leaves (6%), root system development (15.7–27.4%), and yield (15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved plant height by 10.9%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
best resultse0
Value
10.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved relative chlorophyll content by 12.61%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contente0
Direction
best resultse0
Value
12.61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved leaf area by 33%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
best resultse0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved shoot dry biomass by 19.3%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
best resultse0
Value
19.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved yield by 17%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
best resultse0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution produced the best results in plant height (10.9%), relative chlorophyll content (12.61%), leaf area (33%), shoot dry biomass (19.3%), and yield (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased fruit total soluble solids by 9.23%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas tolaasiiPseudomonas tolaasiie1symbiont
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation increased total soluble solids (9.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas tolaasii inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved fruit polar diameter by 5.2%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
polar diametere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
5.2%e0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution improved polar diameter (5.2%), total soluble solids (12.3%), and fruit dry biomass (25.53%) compared to the lower concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved fruit total soluble solids by 12.3%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12.3%e0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution improved polar diameter (5.2%), total soluble solids (12.3%), and fruit dry biomass (25.53%) compared to the lower concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% Steiner solution improved fruit dry biomass by 25.53%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% Steiner solutione0
Outcome
fruit dry biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
25.53%e0
Comparator
lower concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 75% Steiner solution improved polar diameter (5.2%), total soluble solids (12.3%), and fruit dry biomass (25.53%) compared to the lower concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation and nutrient concentration factors had no statistically significant interaction.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
interactionse0
Direction
No statistically significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No statistically significant interactions were observed between the evaluated factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application showed positive additive effects.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
positive additive effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when applied together, positive additive effects were evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 49 positive, 7 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 109 positive, 12 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.