Paper · 2023 · Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica

Investigating the Possibility of Using Bulbous Plants in Structurally Supported Gardens

D. Kozáková; M. Jebavý; M. Kunt; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The goal of this research was to determine the most suitable species of bulbous plants for vertical and rooftop gardens in the context of the temperate climatic zone in Prague. The next issue was to determine how plants respond to individual cardinal directions while growing and how long they stay in bloom. This research focused mainly on plant blooming as this is the most important aesthetic element involved. In the individual years how many plants were in bloom, how long they stayed in bloom, how resilient they were, as well as their total persistence which is the most important factor in future decisions involving utilization of structurally supported gardens were recorded. The family Narcissus that thrived best in south facing part of the vertical garden proved to be the most suitable species for both gardens. On contrary, Scilla siberica proved to be the worst choice for south-facing gardens, both with respect to the length of bloom and the quantity of plants in bloom. Muscari armeniacum reached very balanced results of bloom in all cardinal directions. Galanthus woronowii did not show promise to be suited for either locality, and Crocus ‚King of Striped‘ appeared not to be suitable for vertical gardens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narcissus was the most suitable bulbous genus for both vertical and rooftop gardens, thriving best in the south-facing part of the vertical garden.

Taxon
NarcissusNarcissuse0
Outcome
most suitable species for both gardense0
Qualifier
thrived best in south facing part of the vertical gardene0
Setting
vertical gardene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Narcissus
Narcissus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)John O'Neill · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The family Narcissus that thrived best in south facing part of the vertical garden proved to be the most suitable species for both gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–824 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scilla siberica was the worst choice for south-facing gardens in both bloom length and number of plants in bloom.

Taxon
Scilla sibericaScilla sibericae1
Outcome
length of bloom and the quantity of plants in bloome1
Qualifier
worst choicee1
Setting
south-facing gardense1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Scilla siberica
Scilla siberica · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Scilla siberica proved to be the worst choice for south-facing gardens, both with respect to the length of bloom and the quantity of plants in bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muscari armeniacum gave very balanced bloom results in all cardinal directions.

Taxon
Muscari armeniacumMuscari armeniacume2
Outcome
results of bloome2
Qualifier
very balancede2
Setting
all cardinal directionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muscari armeniacum
Muscari armeniacum · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Muscari armeniacum reached very balanced results of bloom in all cardinal directions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Galanthus woronowii was not suited for either locality.

Taxon
Galanthus woronowiiGalanthus woronowiie3
Outcome
suited for either localitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Galanthus woronowii
Galanthus woronowii · Taxonoriginal: Meneerke bloem ; derivative: Peter coxhead · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Galanthus woronowii did not show promise to be suited for either locality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crocus King of Striped was not suitable for vertical gardens.

Taxon
CrocusCrocuse4
Outcome
suitable for vertical gardense4
Setting
vertical gardense4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crocus
Crocus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)KENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Crocus ‚King of Striped‘ appeared not to be suitable for vertical gardens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1227 · show in text ↑