Paper · 2025 · Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Organic Manures and Bio-stimulants as Growth Enhancers for Improving Tuber Yield in Colocasia (Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. Schott)

Parnika A. Gangurde; Pradnya S. Gudadhe; Jog J. D.; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Standardizing the ideal nutrient dosage is necessary to enhance the physico-chemical characteristics of soil, as well as the yield and quality of produce, in order to increase taro yield and quality. In addition to enhancing produce quality, integrated nutrient management (INM) techniques also contribute to increased soil fertility, which benefits the biosphere. Aims: The present study was carried out to enhance the yield of corms and cormels of colocasia with the application of organic manures and bio-stimulants. Study Design: This study employed a Randomized Block Design. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the College of Horticulture, Department of Vegetable Science, Dapoli, during the kharif season, between June to December, 2024. Methodology: The experiment had three replications and eight treatments viz., T1 [RDF (80:60:80 NPK kg ha-1) + FYM (15 t ha-1)], T2 [FYM (30 t ha-1)], T3 [Vermicompost (5 t ha-1)], T4 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1)], T5 [Vermicompost (5 t ha-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)], T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)], T7 [Vermicompost (5 t ha-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1)] and T8 (Absolute control). Results: According to the experimental data, the treatment T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)] exceeded the other treatments with respect to overall corm yield (28.49 q/ ha), cormel yield (150.37 q/ ha), and total yield (178.90 q/ ha) was documented. On the other hand, the treatment T4, i.e., FYM @ 30 t ha-1 and Seaweed Extract @ 3 ml L-1 showed significantly equivalent results. Based on the experimental results, it was revealed that the combined effect of organic sources helped in boosting the corm and cormel quality as well as production of colocasia. Conclusion: The effect of seaweed extract proved crucial in maximising the tuber yield along with the application of farmyard manure and humic acid. This combination led to higher yield production as compared to the other treatments applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced the greatest corm yield, 28.49 q/ ha, among treatments.

Taxon
Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. SchottColocasia esculentat0
Treatment
T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)]e0
Outcome
overall corm yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
28.49 q/ hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)] exceeded the other treatments with respect to overall corm yield (28.49 q/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. Schott”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced the greatest cormel yield, 150.37 q/ ha, among treatments.

Taxon
Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. SchottColocasia esculentat0
Treatment
T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)]e0
Outcome
cormel yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
150.37 q/ hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)] exceeded the other treatments with respect to overall corm yield (28.49 q/ ha), cormel yield (150.37 q/ ha), and total yield (178.90 q/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. Schott”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced the greatest total yield, 178.90 q/ ha, among treatments.

Taxon
Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. SchottColocasia esculentat0
Treatment
T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)]e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
178.90 q/ hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 [FYM (30 t ha-1) + Seaweed Extract (3 ml L-1) + Humic Acid (1 ml L-1)] exceeded the other treatments with respect to overall corm yield (28.49 q/ ha), cormel yield (150.37 q/ ha), and total yield (178.90 q/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. Schott”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave statistically equivalent results to T6.

Taxon
Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. SchottColocasia esculentat0
Treatment
T4, i.e., FYM @ 30 t ha-1 and Seaweed Extract @ 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
equivalent resultse0
Direction
equivalente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T4, i.e., FYM @ 30 t ha-1 and Seaweed Extract @ 3 ml L-1 showed significantly equivalent results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colocasia esculenta var antiquorum L. Schott”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic sources boosted corm and cormel quality and production.

Taxon
colocasiaColocasiae0
Treatment
organic sourcese0
Outcome
corm and cormel quality as well as productione0
Direction
boostinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia
Colocasia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Amoriver Information · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined effect of organic sources helped in boosting the corm and cormel quality as well as production of colocasia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1843 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

other · yield · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.