Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect Different Level of Organic Sources on Growth, Yield, Quality and Economic Response of Moong Bean (Vigna radiata L.) in Central Part of India

Mastu Patel; B. Gangwar; Prasann Kumar

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Excessive utilization of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides, leading to environmental, soil and water contamination and pest outbreaks, has emerged as a significant concern in recent year. In today’s agricultural landscape, there is a growing trend towards organic farming, emphasizing a sift from high-volume to high-value production system. Methods: A field experiment was conducted in Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh during kharif season of 2021. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design and replicated thrice with nine treatments combination, three different sources of organic viz., farm yard manure, vermicompost and poultry manure along with Rhizobium and Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB). Result: Experimental results indicated that 1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSB, significantly enhancing growth parameters leaf area, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation per meter square, yield attributes like Pod weight, grain yield and quality attributes, higher net return.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic manure and microbial treatment significantly enhanced leaf area, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Vigna radiata L.Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation per meter squaree0
Direction
enhancinge0
Setting
Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Uttar Pradeshe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSB, significantly enhancing growth parameters leaf area, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation per meter square”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Moong Bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly enhanced pod weight, grain yield and quality attributes.

Taxon
Vigna radiata L.Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
Pod weight, grain yield and quality attributese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSB, significantly enhancing growth parameters leaf area, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation per meter square, yield attributes like Pod weight, grain yield and quality attributes, higher net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave higher net return.

Treatment
1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSBe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“1/3 through farm yard manure (16.66 q ha-1) + 1/3 through poultry manure (2.77 q ha-1) + through vermicompost (8.33 q ha-1) + rhizobium + PSB, significantly enhancing growth parameters leaf area, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation per meter square, yield attributes like Pod weight, grain yield and quality attributes, higher net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1165 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

phosphorus · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.