Paper · 2025 · PeerJ

Selection of suitable wheat genotypes under thermal stress and complex genotype-environment interaction using stability analyses and selection indices

Abdelhalim Ghazy; Walid Ben Romdhane; Majed Alotaibi; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Thermal stress is a consequence of climate change that threatens food security, causes plant tissue damage, and harms crop production, particularly during the pollination and fertilization period and in grain-filling stages negatively impacting the number of grains, grain size, and quality. Genotype-environment interaction (GEN: ENV) complicates the selection of optimal wheat genotypes due to the complex genetic basis of yield under varying conditions. Diversified approaches were put forth in response to the pressing demand for simultaneous enhancements in high-yield performance combined with stability. This study investigates the selection of ideal wheat genotypes under thermal stress and complex GEN: ENV using stability analyses and selection indices to assess genotype performance and stability. Twenty wheat genotypes were evaluated across optimal conditions (OC) and thermal stress conditions (TSC) over three growing seasons with six ENVs. Results demonstrated significant GEN: ENV, revealing genetic variations in thermal tolerance. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI2) biplot indicated a combined variance of 99.00%, and eleven genotypes showed stable grain yield (GY) with six ENVs, three (G05, G09, and G17) were more stable. The G04, G05, G06, G09, and G18 genotypes were chosen for GY as perfect (stable and high-performance) genotypes by weighted average of absolute scores biplot (WAASB) and were also identified as the best genotypes group by WAASB-GY, with the exception of G18. Ten selection indices showed significant positive associations under GY oc and GY tsc , so they can be leveraged to detect the genotype’s high yield of GY tsc indirectly. The heritability, accuracy, and r gen: env values for most indices were high, indicating a major role of the genotypic effect in their inheritance, with the exception of the stress-non-stress production index (SNPI) index. Out of the five that were examined by WAASB, G04, G05, G06, and G09 were the top-ranking genotypes by the multi-trait genotype ideotype distance index, either before or after removing variables. This suggests that they could be examined for validation stability measures. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for ENVs variety selection, facilitating the identification of improved cultivars and supporting the development of thermal stress-resilient breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interaction was significant, indicating variation in thermal tolerance.

Outcome
GEN: ENVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrated significant GEN: ENV, revealing genetic variations in thermal tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AMMI2 biplot indicated combined variance of 99.00%.

Outcome
combined variancee0
Value
99.00%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI2) biplot indicated a combined variance of 99.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven genotypes had stable grain yield across six environments.

Outcome
stable grain yielde0
Value
eleven genotypese0
Setting
six ENVse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eleven genotypes showed stable grain yield (GY) with six ENVs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G05, G09 and G17 were more stable.

Material
G05, G09, and G17e0
Outcome
stablee0
Direction
more stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three (G05, G09, and G17) were more stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAASB selected G04, G05, G06, G09 and G18 for stable high grain yield.

Material
G04, G05, G06, G09, and G18e0
Outcome
stable and high-performancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The G04, G05, G06, G09, and G18 genotypes were chosen for GY as perfect (stable and high-performance) genotypes by weighted average of absolute scores biplot (WAASB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAASB-GY identified the same best group except G18.

Outcome
best genotypes groupe0
Comparator
G18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were also identified as the best genotypes group by WAASB-GY, with the exception of G18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten selection indices were significantly positively associated under optimal and thermal stress grain yield.

Outcome
positive associationse0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
GY oc and GY tsce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten selection indices showed significant positive associations under GY oc and GY tsc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most indices had high heritability, accuracy and genotype by environment correlation, except SNPI.

Outcome
heritability, accuracy, and r gen: env valuese0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
with the exception of the stress-non-stress production index (SNPI) indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The heritability, accuracy, and r gen: env values for most indices were high, indicating a major role of the genotypic effect in their inheritance, with the exception of the stress-non-stress production index (SNPI) index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multi-trait index ranked G04, G05, G06 and G09 highest both before and after variable removal.

Material
G04, G05, G06, and G09e0
Outcome
top-ranking genotypese0
Comparator
before or after removing variablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G04, G05, G06, and G09 were the top-ranking genotypes by the multi-trait genotype ideotype distance index, either before or after removing variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2121 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest validating stability measures for G04, G05, G06 and G09.

Material
G04, G05, G06, and G09e1
Outcome
examined for validation stability measurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that they could be examined for validation stability measures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2122–2198 · show in text ↑
e1

“G04, G05, G06, and G09 were the top-ranking genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2025 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑