Paper · 2025 · Functional Plant Biology

Drought stress in Andrographis paniculata: impact on physiological parameters and andrographolide content as mediated by growth stages

Pritee Singh; V. Keshava Rao; R. H. Laxman; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Andrographis paniculata, commonly known as kalmegh is a highly valued medicinal plant. Pot-grown plants were subjected to water stress at vegetative, flowering, and fruiting stage by withholding water supply, followed by rewatering to facilitate recovery. Plants at the flowering and fruiting stage were particularly sensitive to drought stress compared to those at the vegetative stage. The plants were analysed for four diterpenoid compounds, namely andrographolide, 14-deoxyandrographolide, neoandrographolide, and andrograpanin. In plants subjected to stress at the vegetative and flowering stage, total andrographolide content increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05), by as much as 37% and 44%, respectively, over the levels in the control following 6 or more days of exposure, but remained unaffected in plants subjected to stress at the fruiting stage. Across all three stages, a significant decrease was observed in dry weight, relative water content (RWC), photosynthesis, conductance, and transpiration. Total andrographolide content was negatively correlated to dry weight, RWC, and rate of photosynthesis. These findings are useful in (1) identifying the ideal harvesting stage to achieve peak levels of bioactive compounds, (2) scheduling irrigation more efficiently to minimise yield loss due to water stress and maximise the content of bioactive compounds, and (3) developing stress-tolerant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering and fruiting plants were more drought sensitive than vegetative plants.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Organ / stage
flowering and fruiting stagee0
Outcome
sensitive to drought stresse0
Direction
particularly sensitivee0
Comparator
vegetative stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants at the flowering and fruiting stage were particularly sensitive to drought stress compared to those at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress at the vegetative stage increased total andrographolide content by as much as 37% versus control.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Organ / stage
vegetativee0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
total andrographolide contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
6 or more days of exposuree0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plants subjected to stress at the vegetative and flowering stage, total andrographolide content increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05), by as much as 37% and 44%, respectively, over the levels in the control following 6 or more days of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress at flowering increased total andrographolide content by as much as 44% versus control.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
total andrographolide contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
6 or more days of exposuree0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plants subjected to stress at the vegetative and flowering stage, total andrographolide content increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05), by as much as 37% and 44%, respectively, over the levels in the control following 6 or more days of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress at fruiting left total andrographolide content unaffected.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Organ / stage
fruiting stagee0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
remained unaffectede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but remained unaffected in plants subjected to stress at the fruiting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased dry weight across all three stages.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Across all three stagese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across all three stages, a significant decrease was observed in dry weight, relative water content (RWC), photosynthesis, conductance, and transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased relative water content across all three stages.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Across all three stagese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across all three stages, a significant decrease was observed in dry weight, relative water content (RWC), photosynthesis, conductance, and transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration across all three stages.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
photosynthesis, conductance, and transpiratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Across all three stagese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across all three stages, a significant decrease was observed in dry weight, relative water content (RWC), photosynthesis, conductance, and transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total andrographolide content was negatively correlated with dry weight, relative water content and photosynthesis rate.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
Total andrographolide contente0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Qualifier
dry weight, RWC, and rate of photosynthesise0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total andrographolide content was negatively correlated to dry weight, RWC, and rate of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–41 · show in text ↑