Paper · 2025 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Comparative effects of urea and nano-urea on growth and yield performance of transplanted rice in the inner Terai Region of Nepal

Ankit Dumre; Ashim Neupane; Bijay Yadav; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficient nitrogen management is essential for enhancing rice productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Overdependence on conventional urea often leads to suboptimal crop response and significant nitrogen losses to the environment. To address this, a field experiment was conducted during the 2023 rainy season in the Inner Terai region of Deukhuri, Dang, Nepal, to assess the effect of integrating conventional granular urea with nano-urea on the growth and yield of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6). The study included eight treatments: a control, 100% recommended dose of nitrogen recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) using ures, and six combinations of 75% or 50% RDN with nano-urea applied at vegetative and/or booting stages. Growth and yield parameters such as plant height, tiller number, panicle length, thousand-grain weight, grain and straw yield, filled grains per panicle, and sterility percentage were measured. The highest grain yield (4.38 t ha-1) was obtained under 100% RDN, while the treatment with 75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stage produced a statistically comparable yield (4.16 t ha-1). This treatment also recorded higher straw yield (7.07 t ha-1), longer panicles (23.96 cm), and more filled grains per panicle (198.67). In contrast, treatments with nano-urea alone resulted in lower yields, despite slightly reducing sterility. Overall, the findings indicate that partial substitution of urea with nano-urea, particularly at 25% applied at the vegetative stage, can sustain rice yield and thereby offering a more resource-efficient nitrogen management strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended nitrogen produced the highest grain yield, 4.38 t ha-1.

Material
Hardinath-6e1
Treatment
100% RDNe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.38 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (4.38 t ha-1) was obtained under 100% RDN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventy-five percent recommended nitrogen plus 25% nano-urea at vegetative stage yielded 4.16 t ha-1, statistically comparable with full nitrogen.

Treatment
75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
statistically comparablee0
Value
4.16 t ha-1e0
Comparator
100% RDNe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with 75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stage produced a statistically comparable yield (4.16 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest grain yield (4.38 t ha-1) was obtained under 100% RDN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1013 · show in text ↑
e2

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial substitution treatment recorded higher straw yield of 7.07 t ha-1.

Treatment
75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stagee1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.07 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher straw yield (7.07 t ha-1), longer panicles (23.96 cm), and more filled grains per panicle (198.67).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial substitution treatment produced longer panicles of 23.96 cm.

Treatment
75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stagee1
Outcome
paniclese0
Direction
longere0
Value
23.96 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher straw yield (7.07 t ha-1), longer panicles (23.96 cm), and more filled grains per panicle (198.67).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The partial substitution treatment produced more filled grains per panicle, 198.67.

Treatment
75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stagee1
Outcome
filled grains per paniclee0
Direction
moree0
Value
198.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher straw yield (7.07 t ha-1), longer panicles (23.96 cm), and more filled grains per panicle (198.67).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN + 25% nano-urea applied at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-urea alone gave lower yields.

Treatment
nano-urea alonee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with nano-urea alone resulted in lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-urea alone slightly reduced sterility.

Treatment
nano-urea alonee0
Outcome
sterilitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with nano-urea alone resulted in lower yields, despite slightly reducing sterility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1396 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend partial urea substitution with 25% nano-urea at the vegetative stage to sustain yield.

Outcome
partial substitution of urea with nano-urea, particularly at 25% applied at the vegetative stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partial substitution of urea with nano-urea, particularly at 25% applied at the vegetative stage, can sustain rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L., variety Hardinath-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.