Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Economic Plants

Effect of Nano-urea on Growth, Productivity and Economics of Transplanted Rice

Sneha Pedireddy; Manish Kumar; Soumya Saha; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during July to November of 2021 to assess the effect of nano-urea on growth and productivity of rice at ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design consisting eight treatments viz., Recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through urea (T1), 50% of RDN (urea)+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.2% at Active tillering (AT) and Panicle initiation (PI) stages (T2), 75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.2% at AT and PI (T3), 50% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at (AT and PI) (T4), 75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI (T5), 25% of RDN+Four foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.2% at 20,33,50 and 65 DAT (T6), 25% of RDN+Four foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% 20,33,50 and 65 DAT (T7) and control (no fertilizer application) (T8). Results showed that foliar spray of nano-urea resulted in higher plant height (120.1 cm), tillers number m-2 (265) and dry matter accumulation (741.9 kg ha-1). Yield attributes viz., panicle number m-2, number of grains panicle-1, number of filled grains panicle-1 were significantly influenced by the application of nano-urea. The highest grain yield (5.39 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.73 t ha-1) was recorded with the application of 75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI stages. The application of nano-urea resulted in saving of nitrogen (urea) to an extent of 25%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-urea produced higher rice plant height of 120.1 cm.

Treatment
foliar spray of nano-ureae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
120.1 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of nano-urea resulted in higher plant height (120.1 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-urea produced higher tiller density of 265 per square metre.

Treatment
foliar spray of nano-ureae0
Outcome
tillers number m-2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
265e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of nano-urea resulted in higher plant height (120.1 cm), tillers number m-2 (265)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-urea produced higher dry matter accumulation of 741.9 kg ha-1.

Treatment
foliar spray of nano-ureae0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
741.9 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of nano-urea resulted in higher plant height (120.1 cm), tillers number m-2 (265) and dry matter accumulation (741.9 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-urea significantly influenced panicle number, grains per panicle and filled grains per panicle.

Treatment
application of nano-ureae0
Outcome
panicle number m-2, number of grains panicle-1, number of filled grains panicle-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle number m-2, number of grains panicle-1, number of filled grains panicle-1 were significantly influenced by the application of nano-urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDN plus two 0.4% nano-urea sprays treatment gave the highest grain yield, 5.39 t ha-1.

Treatment
75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.39 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (5.39 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.73 t ha-1) was recorded with the application of 75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDN plus two 0.4% nano-urea sprays treatment gave the highest straw yield, 6.73 t ha-1.

Treatment
75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI stagese0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.73 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (5.39 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.73 t ha-1) was recorded with the application of 75% of RDN+two foliar sprays of nano-urea @ 0.4% at AT and PI stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-urea application saved 25% of nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
application of nano-ureae0
Outcome
saving of nitrogen (urea)e0
Direction
savinge0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nano-urea resulted in saving of nitrogen (urea) to an extent of 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

309 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.