Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Upland rice yield declined under newly implemented no-till management.

A claim from BIOMASS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING BY COVER CROPS IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO IN THE STATE OF PIAUI · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upland rice yield declined under newly implemented no-till management.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
newly implemented no-till soil managemente0
Outcome
Yields of maize and upland ricee0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of maize and upland rice declined when sown under newly implemented no-till soil management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1436

Title

BIOMASS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING BY COVER CROPS IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO IN THE STATE OF PIAUI

LEANDRO PEREIRA PACHECO; MARINETE MARTINS DE SOUSA MONTEIRO; FABIANO ANDRÉ PETTER; et al. Revista Caatinga 2017. doi:10.1590/1983-21252017v30n102rc

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-63e9ff58de79b44bb35a08dca1e9a3ab86123892b3e10cb3d59fab2b1c794749 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this claim · 587 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    No-tillage rice–wheat had higher net return in Year 1 than the conventional system.

    Saving of Water and Labor in a Rice–Wheat System with No‐Tillage and Direct Seeding Technologies · 2007 · compared with conventional system

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Rice yield under T1 and T2 was highest at 7.81–8.10 Mg ha −1.

    Tillage and Crop Establishment Affects Sustainability of South Asian Rice–Wheat System · 2011

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    ZT direct-seeded rice yielded similarly to or above puddled transplanted rice in the first three years.

    Can productivity and profitability be enhanced in intensively managed cereal systems while reducing the environmental footprint of production? Assessing sustainable intensification options in the breadbasket of India · 2017 · compared with PTR

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Conservation tillage and residue retention increased crop productivity relative to conventional tillage.

    Impact of conservation tillage in rice–based cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and nutrients · 2019 · compared with conventional CTTPR-CT

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    No-tilling reduced fuel-related CO2 output by 42 kg ha−1.

    Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by no-tilling rice cultivation in Hachirogata polder, northern Japan: Life-cycle inventory analysis · 2007

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Rice grain yield was higher under PTR treatment (7–35%), followed by ZTDSR.

    Crop rotation and tillage management options for sustainable intensification of rice-fallow agro-ecosystem in eastern India · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Longer-term conservation agriculture increased rice grain yield by up to 12%.

    Conservation Agriculture for Rice-Based Intensive Cropping by Smallholders in the Eastern Gangetic Plain · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Tiller removal maintained many engorged pollen grains per anther.

    Low temperature induced spikelet sterility in rice. I. Nitrogen fertilisation and sensitive reproductive period · 2003

    Opposite direction

720 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.