Abstract
During the rabi seasons of two successive years (2021–2022 and 2022–2023), spanning November to February, the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatment regimes—T1 (spiromesifen), T2 (thiamethoxam), T3 (thiacloprid), T4 (imidacloprid), T5 (cartap hydrochloride), T6 (chlorpyriphos), as well as T7 (untreated control)—was assessed against Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner) on a single potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti. The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%), while the lowest was observed in T1(5.86–5.89%), followed by T3(6.16-6.48%), T2(6.88–6.98%), T5(7.37–7.68%), T6(8.24–8.86%), and T4(8.66–9.37%). Tuber damage was minimal in T2 (13.25–15.36%) and peaked in the untreated control, T7 (34.19–43.40%). The lowest marketable yield of potato tubers (12.18–13.49 t/ha) was obtained from T7, while T2 produced the highest yield (27.81–28.38 t/ha), closely followed by T1 (26.21–26.72 t/ha). Among all treatments, T6 showed the least favorable cost-benefit ratio (1:1.41–1:1.58), whereas T2 recorded the most favorable ratio (1:2.55–1:2.57). Overall, T1 and T2 proved to be most efficient treatment schedules, significantly enhancing marketable tuber yield and reducing soil pest infestation compared to the control and other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated potato had the highest shoot damage, 10.86–11.26%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Material
- Kufri Jyotie1
- Treatment
- untreated control plote0
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilon
_Figure_22e.jpg?width=60)
Agrotis ipsilone2pest - Outcome
- shoot damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.86–11.26%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_22e.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 shoot damage was 5.86–5.89%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T1 (spiromesifen)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 5.86–5.89%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest was observed in T1(5.86–5.89%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T1 (spiromesifen)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 shoot damage was 6.16-6.48%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T3 (thiacloprid)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 6.16-6.48%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by T3(6.16-6.48%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T3 (thiacloprid)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 shoot damage was 6.88–6.98%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T2 (thiamethoxam)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 6.88–6.98%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T2(6.88–6.98%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T2 (thiamethoxam)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 shoot damage was 7.37–7.68%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T5 (cartap hydrochloride)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 7.37–7.68%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T5(7.37–7.68%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T5 (cartap hydrochloride)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 shoot damage was 8.24–8.86%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T6 (chlorpyriphos)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 8.24–8.86%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T6(8.24–8.86%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T6 (chlorpyriphos)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 shoot damage was 8.66–9.37%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T4 (imidacloprid)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone4pest
- Outcome
- shoot damagee5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 8.66–9.37%e0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T4(8.66–9.37%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T4 (imidacloprid)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
e4“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
e5“The highest shoot damage was recorded in the untreated control plot, T7 (10.86–11.26%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had minimal tuber damage, 13.25–15.36%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T2 (thiamethoxam)e2
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone3pest
- Outcome
- Tuber damagee0
- Direction
- minimale0
- Value
- 13.25–15.36%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tuber damage was minimal in T2 (13.25–15.36%) and peaked in the untreated control, T7 (34.19–43.40%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T2 (thiamethoxam)”
e3“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated control tuber damage peaked at 34.19–43.40%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Interactor
- Agrotis ipsilonAgrotis ipsilone3pest
- Outcome
- Tuber damagee2
- Direction
- peakede0
- Value
- 34.19–43.40%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“peaked in the untreated control, T7 (34.19–43.40%)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“Tuber damage”
e3“Agrotis ipsilon (Hufner)”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated potato had the lowest marketable tuber yield, 12.18–13.49 t/ha.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Outcome
- marketable yield of potato tuberse0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 12.18–13.49 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest marketable yield of potato tubers (12.18–13.49 t/ha) was obtained from T7”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 gave highest marketable tuber yield, 27.81–28.38 t/ha.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T2 (thiamethoxam)e2
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 27.81–28.38 t/hae0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T2 produced the highest yield (27.81–28.38 t/ha)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T2 (thiamethoxam)”
e3“T7 (untreated control)”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 produced 26.21–26.72 t/ha marketable yield.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- T1 (spiromesifen)e2
- Outcome
- marketable yield of potato tuberse3
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 26.21–26.72 t/hae0
- Comparator
- T7 (untreated control)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“closely followed by T1 (26.21–26.72 t/ha)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“T1 (spiromesifen)”
e3“marketable yield of potato tubers”
e4“T7 (untreated control)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the least favorable cost-benefit ratio, 1:1.41–1:1.58.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- least favorablee0
- Value
- 1:1.41–1:1.58e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T6 showed the least favorable cost-benefit ratio (1:1.41–1:1.58)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had the most favorable cost-benefit ratio, 1:2.55–1:2.57.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe2
- Direction
- most favorablee0
- Value
- 1:2.55–1:2.57e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T2 recorded the most favorable ratio (1:2.55–1:2.57)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
e2“cost-benefit ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors found T1 and T2 the most efficient schedules for yield and infestation.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Outcome
- most efficient treatment schedulese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T1 and T2 proved to be most efficient treatment schedules, significantly enhancing marketable tuber yield and reducing soil pest infestation compared to the control and other treatments”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · Agrotis ipsilon · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →chlorpyrifos · Agrotis ipsilon · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.